Northern Ireland – Ulster Early 1600s and English Plantations

When we last visited Northern Ireland (Scotland and Ireland and European Politics) Queen Elizabeth had raised an army to quell the rebellion of the Irish Lords and by1603 the Irish countryside had been decimated, including the English Plantations in that country. In the North of Ireland the English had employed a scorched earth policy and war and famine resulted in 10% of the population dying. The butchery was particularly oppressive in Ulster where man, woman, and child was butchered in addition to any farm animals and crops burned when not needed for the soldiers. It was a war of extermination as Irishmen were looked upon as laser men, “meer Irish” and wild beasts.  The Irish Lord O’Neil reported 70,000 supporters dead and the English lost 30,000 English and Welsh men conscripted to fight the war. The English treasury was exhausted. The Irish Lords had to vacate their Irish Titles but were allowed to keep their English Titles and the rebels were all pardoned. 

In 1603 Queen Elizabeth died without an heir and James VI of Scotland succeeded to the English Throne as James I of England, Scotland, and Ireland. James was the son of Mary, Queen of Scots and Lord Darnley and was the Great-Great Grandson of Henry VII. Upon taking the Scottish Throne in 1567 (at age one) he was controlled by regents but exerted his independence from them about 1583 and was allied with England.  Even though the Crown was united the countries of England and Scotland remained separate politically with both holding their own Parliaments. 

Scotland under James IV to James VI was actually 2 lands with the Highlands still under the Clan System and only minimally controlled by the King.  Additionally the reformation was slow to encroach on the Highlands and they remained mostly Catholic.  The view of the Scottish lowlander and Englishman alike was that the highlands, like the Irish who were also under the Clan System and Catholic, was that the population were savages.  Given the poverty of Scotland (See Scotland 1600 – Life in the Lowlands) the English viewed themselves superior to the Lowland Scots, a view that continued under James I.

Queen Elizabeth had tried to control Ireland by sending nobles to rule over estates but they would, over time, become Anglo-Irish and ended up siding with the people against England.  Next she tried “Planting” Lords and Gentry who would bring over English Settlers, in the 1560s in Leinster and Munster and in the 1570s in Ulster but they failed due to physical opposition by the displaced and multitudes of Irish in general and also due to a lack of Englishmen willing to settle their families in a hostile environment. None of Ireland was peaceful but the worst troubles were in Ulster under the Great Clan Leaders, the Earls Tyrone and Tyrconnel, who eventually had to submit after their revolt was put down by Lord Mountjoy who laid waste to Ulster causing mass starvation (to the point of cannibalism).  This was the state of England, Scotland, and Ireland that James I inherited.

Con O’Neill was an Irish Chieftain of large property holdings on the coast in Counties Down and Antrim, those being nearest to Scotland (in fair weather visible to each other) who found himself imprisoned due to “instigating rebellion against the Queen” for a drunken altercation with her soldiers over a supply of wine.  Hugh Montgomery, a Laird of Northern Ayrshire, learned of his imprisonment and hatched a plan to facilitate his escape and a pardon for half of Con O’Neill’s land. Using the Cons wife materials were smuggled into Carrickfergus Castle where he was held and his escape, and ultimately a pardon was completed.

However, King James would not ratify the assignment of the lands and the assistance of another Ayrshire Laird, James Hamilton, who had great influence with the King, was obtained by agreement each receiving one-third of O’Neills holdings if the assignment could be completed. King James knighted Con O’Neill and ratified the property agreement with the condition that the lands would be “planted with British Protestants,” and not to “any person of meer Irish extraction.” Con O’Neill then eventually out his holdings to Hamilton and Montgomery.

For those not familiar with the story of Hamilton, Montgomery, and O’Neill a more in-depth account can be found here, https://discoverulsterscots.com/history-culture/hamilton-montgomery/settlement-story.  Given the intrigue surrounding the story and it’s implications for the future settlement of Plantations not only in Northern Ireland but also North America in Virginia I can only wonder why the entire story has not been made into a full length movie, perhaps it will in the future.  For us Hays it was the beginning of the story of our migration to Ulster and then on to the American Colonies.

In 1606 Hamilton and Montgomery began importing Scots from Ayrshire which was only about a 20 to 30 mile trip. The early crop returns were so good that word travelled back to Scotland and further immigration continued. By 1614 Hamilton and Montgomery could raise 2000 fighting men which indicates a population of eight thousand Lowland Scots in under 10 years. Given the sparse land in the Lowlands of Scotland the fertile soil and plentiful harvests must have been considered a Godsend. 

Sir Arthur Chichester, English Lord Deputy for Ireland had been given grants of land in County Antrim near Belfast in1603 for his war service. He planted his properties with farmers from his home area of Devon and also Cheshire and Lancashire, all in the west of England. His Plantations prospered and southern Antrim took on an English character.  There were other moderately successful Plantations in the County of Monaghan.

Clan Hay impact on the settlements.  In my reading some years back I came across a reference to the fact that originally James I looked to try to settle primarily English but was convinced by a Sir Hay who was part of his court to extend the offers also to Lowland Scots.  With apologies for not being able to find the exact reference I did find a Sir Hay as part of James I court. Sir James Hay, son of Sir James Hay of Fingask, 2nd son of Peter Hay of Mengginch, (a branch of Hay of Leys, a younger branch of the Errol Family) was knighted by James VI of Scotland and in 1603 moved to England as part of his court. In 1612 he was a director of the Virginia Company and in 1627 he was awarded grant of all Caribbean Islands including Barbados and in 1622 he was made Earl of Carlisle, a peerage which ended with his son James who died with no issue in 1660.

Even though the Great Clan Chiefs, the Earl of Tyrone and Earl of Tyrconnell retained their English titles in 1603 the intrigue continued for control of Ulster.  Seeing the writing on the wall,  in 1607 the two Clan Chiefs fled Ireland never to return (search “Flight of the Earls” for further).  In 1608 their holdings were declared escheat to the King.  Technically, under the law, only the estates of the two Chiefs should have been seized but it was argued that as there was no private property in Ireland as all Clan lands “belonged” to the great chiefs, the sub chiefs were determined to be “tenants” with no rights to the land they controlled.  This amounted to over 3,700,000 English Acres with about half a million acres of good farm land.

James I was a proponent of colonizing proposing the creation of Plantations in both Northern Ireland and America (in 1606 approving the colony in Virginia, Jamestown, named for him which influences the Hays diaspora which will be addressed in future posts). The lowlands of Scotland suffered poverty, London was suffering from overcrowding which was suspected of contributing to outbreaks of the plague, and there was the forever present “pesky Irish problem” of the “barbarism” of the Irish. James I looked at Plantations as a solution to his many problems.

By the Kings design grants would be awarded to gentry from England and Scotland (Lowlands only), veterans of the Irish wars, the London Companies, the Established Church of Ireland, and  Trinity College in Dublin with about half of the useful available land allotted to them.  Any grant to a lord (undertaker when granted) was obliged to “plant” his estate with farmers from the 2 countries and also required to build a castle and a Bawn (stone enclosure for the protection of livestock during raids). Veterans (Servitors) were given grants but they were required to build a house instead of a castle and could take Irish Tenants. Of the remaining half 1/10th was granted to the London Companies, powerful guilds of the established companies (and the effective government) of London. 2/10ths went to the Established Church and Trinity College. 1/10th for the establishment of forts and towns and the remaining 1/10th to the Irish Gentry of good merit who could take whatever tenants they liked assuming they would hire the Irish Catholics.

A shrewd businessman James I added the title of Baronet which sat between Baron and Knight and bearing the title of Sir. For the price of 1000 Pounds they obtained a hereditary title and the right of a coat of arms bearing the bloody hand of Ulster. 205 English landowners paid the price to advance to this title bringing an impressive sum for that time to the King.  

Initially grants were directed towards English (as previously noted) but in 1609 the King, “out of his unspeikable love and tinder affectioun” for Scottish subjects decided they were allowed to participate. 79 Scots applied and 59, 5 were noblemen men and the rest gentry, were awarded grants of 81,000 acres. “Unspeikable love” aside, the King skewed the grants towards the southwest of Scotland recognizing the nearness to Ulster and the fact that interactions had been previously occurring. Also a 21 year lease on Virgin soil would attract the Scot farmer would attract away from his hard life more so than the English Gentry and farmer who were better situated in their homeland situated further away.

The Scottish undertakers attracted primarily Presbyterian Scots rendering Donegal and Tyrone Counties mostly Scot. English undertakers attracted Episcopalian Englishmen, many of them Puritans, making them a majority in Armagh and Derry Counties. Fermanagh and Cavan Counties were a mix of Scot and English. Down and Antrim had already been settled with Scots by Hamilton and Montgomery and Antrim had Chichester’s English Colonists. Monaghan County remained for the most part Irish. The London Companies brought in Tyrone County which they renamed Londonderry but the Puritans soon left due to harsh conditions and were replaced by Scots. Thus by 1610 Ulster was the home to 3 distinct peoples with different backgrounds, culture, and religion. 

The success of the Ulster Plantations was not a given.  Many undertakers were absentee landlords and their agents dishonest. Many undertakers reviewed their holdings and then returned home looking to sell them. The quality of the original tenants were low as often those first enticed to a new land are the unsuccessful in their homeland for various reasons and in spite of restrictions many hired Irish natives.  The success of the Plantations was mainly due to the Scot undertakers and the closeness of Scotland to Ulster in drawing manpower. The nearness also allowed undertakers to return to Scotland and back to Ulster to maintain control of their holdings. The Scots showed themselves to be industrious and their prospect of success was increased over that of life in Scotland. 

The Ulster tenant farmer secured a lease for anywhere from 21 years to life. And the farmer made his agreement himself with the undertaker, striking his own bargain.  And thus the feudalism of Scotland was left behind. The Scot settlers were also followed by their ministers from the Kirk of Scotland, reinforcing the reformation and unity among them. The participation in the church by the common man and the ability to stoke his own bargain made the move to Ulster one great side towards individualism.

Religious factions and their impact on government

James VI of Scotland was baptized a Catholic but was taken from his Catholic mother, Mary, Queen of Scots when she was arrested and imprisoned by Protestant Rebels in 1567. When she was deposed James VI was crowned at 13 months old and raised according to the beliefs of the Church of Scotland, the Presbyterian Kirk.  The times of his youth were tumultuous with many vying for power including his Catholic mother having escaped captivity in 1568 who was ultimately defeated in battle, fled to England, and was imprisoned by Queen Elizabeth.  James was declared an adult ruler in 1579 but remained under the influence of others. In 1582 James was taken prisoner by Protestant Earls, but ultimately liberated in 1583.

In 1582 the Church of Scotland rejected episcopal governance (by bishops) and adopted a presbyterian government (by elders).  Even though James was raised in the Church of Scotland his views on religion were influenced by his monarchy and maintaining power.  In 1584 he introduced the Black Acts placing 2 Bishops in control of the Church of Scotland, an act which was met with vigorous opposition.  When crowned King of England he increased the Scottish Bishops. In 1604 James presided over disagreements with the English Bishops and Puritan looking to reform the Anglican Church and when the Puritans demanded reform of the Episcopacy James responded “no Bishops, no King” as he believed in Apostolic Succession supporting the Divine Right of Kings.      

The religious factions vying for power were Irish Catholics, Scottish Highland Catholics, Catholics remaining in Scotland and England.  The Church of England, an episcopal organization but with Puritan members looking to reform it. The Church of Ireland, also Episcopal but with many Puritans in its organization, and the Church of Scotland which was Presbyterian but had Bishops placed to attempt to control it.  The level of animosity between religions is evident in The Gunpowder Plot of 1605 where English Roman Catholics planned to blow up Parliament and King James with 20 barrels of gunpowder in secreted in a room below, the plot foiled when a conspirator warned his brother in law not to attend that day. 

In 1610 Scotland began moving from a Feudal System where a family worked the same land for generations to a “Feu,” a fixed rent system with no obligation in service.  A fixed fee allowed the lairds to out bid farmers who had been on the land for generations forcing them into sub tenants or hired labor. The loss of status had many leaving Scotland for Ulster.  Over 30 year following it is estimated that at least 40,000 Scots left for Ulster.

The migration of farmers and their families also brought the migration of Presbyterian Ministers.  In 1618 James enacted Five Articles of Episcopalian practices which were widely boycotted in Scotland and which had non conforming ministers imprisoned or banished.  Many of these took the trip to Ulster where the Church of Ireland, although Episcopal, operated closer to the Presbyterian model due to Puritan influence.  This had the effect of making the Protestant Church of Ireland undivided and including Episcopal, Puritan, and Presbyter alike. The people responded to the religious teachings and many gatherings resulted in overflowed churches and many outdoor revivals began to occur.  

James elder son died in 1612 leaving his second son, Prince Charles, as heir.  James died in 1625 leaving Charles I as King of England, Scotland, and Ireland and also the colonies in the Americas. And the rein of Charles I is where we will pick up the story of the history of the Hays and the Presbyterian Scots, generations turning into Presbyterian Ulster Scots, who were their kith and kin in their diaspora.

References:

The Scotch-iris: A Social History by James G. Leyburn, 1962 University of North Carolina Press, can be borrowed at https://archive.org/details/scotchirishsocia0000leyb_a5e7/page/124/mode/2up

The Scotch-Irish or The Scot in North Britain, North Ireland, and North America by Charles A. Hanna, 1902 G.P. Putnam and Sons, NY and London available for download at Internet Archive, https://archive.org 

The Scot in Ulster: Sketch of the History of the Scottish Population of Ulster by John Harrison, MDCCCLXXXVIII, William Blackwood and Sons, Edinburg and London, available for download at Internet Archive, https://archive.org 

The Ulster Scot: His History and Religion by Rev. James Barley Woodburn MA, H.R. Allenson LTD, London available for download at Internet Archive, https://archive.org 

Scotland 1600 – Life in the Lowlands

I must admit that when I first learned of my “Hays” connection to Clan Hay and the Earl of Errol that I bought highland music CD’s (search CD on the internet kids), including some in Gaelic, and even ordered up a complete Prince Charlie with the intent to attend the Scottish Highland games in my area as I was “Scottish”.  Alas I was to learn that if I transported back in time and showed up with my ancestors in 1500’s Scotland wearing a Kilt and speaking Gaelic I would certainly be killed as a raider from the north looking to steal cattle. My ancestor then most likely spoke Scots and dressed in wool or animal skin clothing. 

I had no sense of my ancestry beyond my father, a depression era dust bowl “Okie” who migrated to California, as in the Grapes of Wrath diaspora, and it was only when I did a deep dive into my genealogy (including DNA) that I learned of my American Pioneer Ancestors, arriving in this new world from the lowlands of Scotland with a couple or more generation stop in Northern Ireland. While I have not researched the line beyond the 1700s in America there are general circumstances applied to all the migrators of that era and location which tell us why they came to America.

It has been speculated, based upon DNA, that my ancestry came to Scotland with the Norman invasion and there intermingled with the Anglo-Saxons, most likely in Bernicia which was the northern part of Northumbria which is present day southeast Scotland (south of Edinburg).  There were multiple cadet houses and Hay holdings throughout Scotland and the specific area my line is from has not been determined.  Additionally after hundreds of years in Scotland we migrated to Ulster with other Presbyterians and the formation of the plantations in Northern Ireland in the 1600s at some point.  

So the questions that comes to my mind is why did my ancestors migrate from Scotland to Northern Ireland in the 1600s and then on to America in the early 1700s?  Economic reasons? Religious persecution?  War or famine?  What was their life like and how did they live?  Most historical writings are based upon the aristocracy or church with only passing mention of the daily lives of the common man.  I did find one specific source, “The Scotch-Irish: A Social History” by James G. Leyburn, University of North Carolina Press, 1962.  My writings here are based greatly on that and also by multiple readings of other works, although I found this one, unlike many which focus on the ruling establishment and major historical events, to speak to the every day life and times of the common man of which my ancestors came from.  It can be borrowed from the libraries at archive.org at https://archive.org/details/scotchirishsocia0000leyb/page/n5/mode/2up.  

The Scotch-Irish: A Social History by James G. Leyburn

Given my ancestors came to America as farmers I highly suspected that they were farmers in Ulster and Scotland, part of the peasant class.  While the term peasant is often given a negative connotation it actually means a tiller of the soil, or a farmer (not to be confused with serf which was an economic slave tied to a feudal landowner).  While the social hierarchy was Lords (Nobility with title), Gentry and Lairds (landowners) and Burghers (well off Merchants), then tenants (peasants) each had a responsibility to the others in the feudal system. The Lord was expected to provide protection for all those under him and in return they were bound to provide military service to the nobleman. The tenant paid rent to the Laird (or the Lords agent) and was given a lease on specific lands.  In daily life and business, and especially when on a campaign, they would have been in close contact with each other.

Prior to the reformation few could read or write and this included most nobles.  The only  education was in schools taught in Latin which was to prepare them for a life as Clergy in the Catholic Church. After the Reformation Noble, Gentry, and Peasant alike sent their children to the same Presbyterian School, if available, and it was based upon merit which should continue on to University.  This common purpose to advance a common religion would have brought the adherents even closer regardless of class.  Even though there were distinct classes they interacted freely, often, and without airs. 

As an example of the unity, “An Old Kirk Chronicle: being a history of Auldhame, Tyninghame, and Whitekirk in East Lothian by Rev. P. Lately Waddell, B.D., Minister of the united parish; author of “the Gospel of the Kingdom” published by William Blackwood and Sons, Edinburg and London, MDCCXCIII [(M=1000+D=500+CC=200=1700+(XC=100-10=90)+III=3 which is 1793 if my Roman math and internet search is correct] pg. 107 states;

“ Mariche 18, 1638.  the said day the minister product the Covenant to the session, and red the same before them. … All the men of the parish, gentle, for the moment solemnized and brought face to face with ‘the great name of the Lord their God,’ write their names below the glowing words,…  Lauders and Cunninghames, Jacksons and Ewarts, Kers and Hays, for one day at least lifted above their common toil and out of their jealousies and strife, exalted with a new enthusiasm and bound together by the sacred pledge.”     

While not all Hays were covenanters most at that period i suspect were Presbyterian, the official religion of Scotland, as were their Lords and Lairds and as such a sense of community was strengthened.  

That said, the Tenant Farmers were free to move about as leases expired and changed and they were not bound to a specific Lord as they are in a Clan or strict Feudal System (serf)  except when on his holdings.  Shortages of labor, especially for labor of the correct religion or loyalty allowed the Peasant some flexibility in moving about as leases expired, although kith and kin still provided the best opportunity for the best lease.  Scotland of pre 1600 was mostly isolated from England and France in markets and trade and any agricultural advancements were isolated from them also.  Agricultural production was low, at barely above the subsistence level and as such no industry or trade centers formed of any size and the Burghs in Scotland, unlike the Boroughs in England, traded mostly locally produced goods.

The tenants were broken down into the Kindly (lands to one tenant) or Joint Tenant which was multiple families together forming a Plowgate.  A Plowgate was made up of at least 8 oxen which were needed to pull a single plow.  Kindly and Joint Tenants would rent to a Subtenant who was given a “tack”, a small piece of land on which to place a shack and a garden.  Lairds would usually rent to relatives thus preserving the best parcels for the extended family.  Leases were broken into an infield and outfield with the infield broken into separate strips, a “run-rig” leased by lot every few years the payment a percentage of the crops and eggs and fowl to the big house.  The outfield, usually about six times larger than the infield, was similarly divided.  The frequent changing of lands provided no incentives to improve it.

Oats and Barley were the staples and the outfield would be planted with oats until the soil was poor and then weeds would overcome the field and it would be used for grazing of cattle.  There were no fences or stone walls dividing the land and as such cattle and horses grazing crops was a problem and cause for conflict among neighbors.  Oat cakes were the common staple, a mixture of oats and water fried on a flat skillet and oatmeal, greens, and homemade beer and ale rounded out the diet with a piece of mutton or other meat occasionally if an animal died. 

Having been almost continually at war with England, and in between suffering raiding by opposing Scottish Feudal Estates, English Estates to the south and Highland Clans to the north and west, the lowlands of Scotland were decimated.  There existed nary a tree, the bogs and wetlands were undrained due to no knowledge of current agricultural practices.  There were no fences or stone walls defining holdings and cattle wandered with trespass upon others holdings and plantings. 

People wore animal skins and wool clothes and a cap, many going barefoot or wearing rudimentary leather shoes but most wearing wool clothing.  Huts were built of stone with no mortar so mud and straw was stuffed into the cracks against the cold. They had thatched roofs with a hole in the center to allow smoke from the cook fire to escape.  They had earthen floors, rocks for chairs, and people slept on one side of the hut on thatch or heather beds on the ground and the animals were tethered on the other side of the hut. While rudimentary they could easily be rebuilt after being destroyed during a raid or war.  Personal cleanliness was not yet a virtue and it was considered bad luck to clean a butter churn so hair, human or animal, was common in the butter.   Vermin were common, the huts dirty and stunk, breeding a lot of illness.  

Plows were made of wood and it took 8-12 animals to pull it and required the manpower of all available men within the plow gate. The plow made a shallow rut and not a furrow and they could plow about 1/2 an acre a day.  They used straw harnesses and rope made from hair, harrows were made of wood or even branches tied together.  Crop production was at the mercy of drought, heavy rains, flood, poor soils, and frosts in addition to loss from conflicts.  Ill fed milk cows produced only 2 pints a day and when winter supplies ran low they would bleed the cows to make blood-meal.  In spring everyone participated in “the lifting” as weak undernourished cows and horses had to be lifted onto their feet to get to the grazing fields.

They lived at, or barely above, a subsistence level so in most years there was enough to eat and a small excess to trade which would be at the fair in the burgh.  The entire family would attend to escape the day to day drudgery of work. Farmers sold wool, cattle, and horses.  Merchants sold the wares of tinsmiths, coopers, shoemakers, and haberdashers (clothing and sewing supplies).  Salt was a required commodity for preserving meats, iron (in a good year) and fish were also traded for. Scotland lacked industry and everyday items and arms were imported such as armor, spears, bows and arrows, cart wheels, and wheelbarrows. 

Given their subsistence lifestyle there is no indication the nature of people was depressed.  They enjoyed the fair which included Drambooths offering whiskey, shooting galleries, boxing booths, swings, and sideshows. Localities had their local singers, harpists, and pipe players.  Yule, Easter, and Saints Days were celebrated until the Reformation and the church looking down on such events.  

Boys were married when they could do a man’s work and was able to bear arms often as young as 14.  Girls were married when she was nubile, often as young as 12, a necessity with a life expectancy in the early 30’s.  Neighbors were expected to provide a feast at the ceremony and essentials for setting up a household. Weddings were festive with feasting, dancing, and ribaldry although the Kirk attempted to change the wedding practices.  Women attended to the duties of house and children but also were expected to labor in the field, especially when the men were called away to war.

Men were bound to serve 40 days in service of the lord for war.  Eager to go they were equally eager to get back home and many would after a week or two regardless if the war was over or not.  When called to war the men brought their own weapons, wooden pike or spear, an axe or a short sword, a knife, and a targe (a small round wooded shield covered with animal skin).  They carried a small metal plate and would use it to cook their oat cakes with the meal including any animals plundered in the march.  War, raiding, and defending against raids fostered an adventurous spirit and many younger sons of the gentry and farming class sought their fortunes in other countries in wars or in merchandise.

The peasant of Scotland lacked the humility of others in England and Western Europe as the system was reliant on loyalty to a laird or lord who proved his quality as a man and had earned the loyalty.  Justice, and the responsibility for life and goods in his domain, was the responsibility of the lord and thus it was a system of men and not laws.  Within this system a tenant versus tenant dispute assured a reasonable chance at a fair hearing and resolution of the dispute.  Smaller claims were heard by the laird and higher by the lord but in most instances justice was delivered at the hand of the offended.  The phrase might makes right applies to the times. Hundreds of years later the Clan feuds of rural America trace back to Scotland.

Scotland was changed greatly by the Reformation which in Scotland was generally a peaceful affair (for the times) with the people won over to the ideals of Presbyterianism.  It introduced a measure of democracy in church governance, fostered a community belief in morality (enforced by the Kirk), and introduced rudimentary education to the masses so they may themselves search the word of the bible.  Saints Days celebrations were replaced with attendance at inordinately long sermons and attending to religious beliefs and practices.  The failing of the official church was the failing of all official churches in that they looked to dismiss all others although unlike other religions Presbyterians only fined and imprisoned non converts in lieu of death. 

1600s Scotland lacked the rule of law, science, industry, and trade.  The Renaissance was late in coming and the Scot, lord. laird, and peasant alike lived in a hostile environment with few years passed where there was not war.  They often held the same surname and were bound together by loyalty but were loyal where loyalty was earned.  They were devoutly religious and loyal to the Kirk and Presbyterianism and active participants in religious education and affairs of the church and this fostered morality, dignity and worth of all people, self discipline and a disciplined society, and the individual being of primary importance as a moral self created a moral society.

Any current study of the Scot-Irish “race” and attempts to apply attributes based upon the race  (as DNA research shows us) is erroneous at best.  The lowland Scot was a genetic product of multiple introductions of tribes over time; Gaels (Celts), Bretons (Celts), Angles (Germanic), Saxon (Germanic), Scots (Celtic via Ireland), Picts (unknown), Norse (Vikings and Danes), Normans (historically Viking), and others.  The genetic mix is different for each village, clan, and individual and so to assign a trait to a class of people based upon genetics is bound to fail.  IMHO, the nature versus nurture debate lies more so with the nurture and the environment brought up in.

That said the Scot of the lowland of this time was described as Stoic and Dour. It is often attributed to race or religion IMHO it is the times in which they lived which made such a hardy, stern, and bold people who could endure hardship which was upon their doorstep daily. The hierarchy of the Presbyterian Church, the Kirk, was such that the people were involved in the church and many were devout worshippers often willing to lose their life or freedom before denying their beliefs which added to their dour nature and loyalty to one another.  The Presbyterian lowland Scot was formed by isolation of country, turbulent affairs, and poverty but was not a subjugated individual.   

To assign generalities to the “Scot-Irish” also ignores the social status upon migration, time of migration, and the cause of the migration (persecution, famine, war, etc.). Whether young single men searching for fame and fortune or entire families and communities relocating two conditions need to be present to foster migration, hard times in your current location and the perception of better opportunities where you are going. Hard times existed in the lowlands of Scotland and given the opportunities to farm in Northern Ireland it is understandable that many would look to relocate there in the 1600s, my ancestors among them.      

Next up, Ulster Scot Presbyterians in Northern Ireland in the 1600s. 

Scotland, Ireland and European Politics 1500-1600

1566 Map by French mapmaker Nicolas Desliens

We know from our DNA tests that John Hays who settled in VA and Patrick Hays (and brothers) who settled in PA had a common ancestor, that when arriving in America they were Presbyterian and came most likely from the tenant farmer class most likely from the Scottish lowlands, most likely southwest Scotland, then into Ulster before coming to America.  Even without specific dates and locations for the diaspora we can learn much of their reasoning for the moves by looking at history in general.

The DNA diaspora which paused in Scotland continues west to North America.

In 1500 Scotland and England were separate states each with their own king, but both with a waning feudal system moving towards a Nation State but with the Lords wielding much power.  Ireland was under the Clan System with the great Clan Chiefs taking turns at being in charge of all with England looking to control as the century progressed.  All were Roman Catholic, as was most of Europe at the start of the century but the reformation; Luther in Germany followed by Calvin and then his followers, saw protestants split from Roman Catholics and then Protestants further divide into various factions of Episcopal’s, Presbyters, and Congregationalists.  Spain was the major power with the largest navy at the start of the century but after Columbus discovered the new world all naval powers were looking for a passage to Asia.

The search for the northwest passage ended up in the discovery of the Americas.  Shortly thereafter attempts to establish settlements and control centered around the exploitation of the resources and natives.  Columbus exploited Hispaniola and Spain established a settlement in 1502 and fanned out from there; Jamaica 1509, Trinidad 1510, Florida in 1513, and conquered South America starting in 1519.  The French began with Cartier in present day Canada in 1534 and French Huguenots tried to settle in Florida in 1562 but no permanent settlement were made by 1600.  Sir Walter Raleigh in 1584 tried for England in Virginia but failed there. It would be in the 1600s before we see any settlements as Spains power decreased in relation to the other European powers.

After Columbus in 1497 we have John Cabot sailing for England landing in present Newfoundland claiming it for king. “The Curse of the Axe,” a documentary about an iron axe buried in a Wyandot village reveals that it is from the Basque region of Spain and it came to present day Canada with Spanish fishermen and whalers who set up summer camps on shore, evidence of early contact.  In 1507 Amerigo Vespucci sailing for Spain made several trips, accurate accounts are under dispute, and he wrote 2 books of his adventures which were widely read and spurred interest in the new world.  He claimed to sail the Guif of Mexico and the coast from Florida too Chesapeake Bay and it seems to be accepted at the time as maps made of his writings had the area named “America” in his honor. 

In 1513 Ponce de Leon landed in Florida and claimed it for Spain and in 1519 Hernan Cortez landed in Mexico and claiming it for Spain he then proceeded to then conquer the Aztecs. France got into the act with Giovanni Verrazzano in 1524 landing in present day NY and Narraganset Bay.  Also in 1524 Esteban Gomez for Spain sailed the eastern seaboard from Florida to Nova Scotia, failing to find a passage he took a large number of Indians prisoner to sell as slaves so he had something to show for his journey. Diego Ribero made a hand drawn map of America from Gomez trip, and in 1527 created the Padron Real Map of the world as it was then known. 

In 1534 French navigator Jacques Cartier was looking for the Northwest Passage when he discovered the Gulf of St. Lawrence and the St. Lawrence River.  He would return in 1535 and sail the St. Lawrence to the city of Hochelaga (present day Montreal, more under East America following).  Hernando de Soto landed in Florida near present day Tampa Bay with a large force and for the next 3 years explored and conquered the southeast of America, finally discovering the Mississippi River (more under Eastern America). 

St Augustine Florida was settled by Spain in 1565 to buffer a settlement by French Huguenots in Fort Caroline, present day Jacksonville.  And in 1584 Sir Walter Raleigh explored Roanoke, present day North Carolina and in 1585 returned to set up a colony (more on these in Eastern America).  Unlike future endeavors to settle and live and farm, these pre 1600 settlements were to buffer other countries advantages to trade and act as posts from which to privateer.  Spanish settlements were bases on which to exploit the locals and local resources.   

Early Spanish settlements in the Caribbean Isles and South and Central America had 2 objectives; convert to Catholicism and exploit the riches which could be plundered and sent back to Spain.  The Pizarro conquest of Peru and Cortez’ conquest of Mexico are two good examples of this.  As the century progressed, the reformation moving away from “Popish Rome” control then added another incentive for European powers to be at odds with each other for the reformed also included conversion to Protestantism, the penalty for non conversion to one or the other often being death.  English, French, and Dutch decisions in the Americas was to offset the Spanish Naval superiority.  Unfortunately for Spain, the loss of much of the Spanish Armada in 1588 to England was to tip the balance of power by 1600 from Spain controlling all of the Americas to French control of present day Canada and the Ohio and Mississippi River, Dutch control of present day NY, and English control of the Southeast and New England in the Northeast. 

Scotland and England

In 1502 King James IV and Henry VII entered into the Treaty of Perpetual Peace in an effort to end the continuous off and on conflicts between the two nations.  Under the treaty James IV is to marry Margaret Tudor, eldest daughter of Henry VII.  A son is born to them who will eventually become King James V of Scotland.  In 1507 King Henry VIII is crowned King of England.

In 1513 King Henry VIII declares war on France and invades them.  King James IV decides to support France and marches to Northumberland and meets an English army at Flodden on 9 September, 1513.  The English used both long bows and artillery against the Scots and then the two sides met in a medieval hand to hand combat battle which ended up with the Scots losing 10,000 men to the English 1200.  King James IV was killed.  Also William the 4th Earl of Errol and Lord High Constable died at the Kings side and John Hay, 2nd Lord Hay of Yester was killed in the battle and I expect many a Hay(s) of all social ranks died there, the feudal loyalty coming before country.

James V was an infant and various Regents and persons were vying for control and at 12 years of age he was crowned but in 1524 he was taken hostage by his stepfather and held for captive for 3 years but in 1528 he escaped and returned to power.  Due to raids north and south by both sides the border region had developed into a lawless area with reivers on both sides plundering.  In 1530 James imposed order on the bandit country as he solidified his control of Scotland. He married the French Kings daughter, Madeleine of Valous who died shortly thereafter.  He then married Mary of Guise, their only child to live was Mary (Queen of Scots), born 1542.

In 1542 James V dies and Mary is crowned Queen of Scots and Marie de guise becomes Queen regent with many others vying for control.  In 1544 King Henry VIII begins the “rough wooing,” cross border raids to entice an arranged marriage to his son Edward so Mary is brought to France for safe keeping as a result.  She is betrothed to Dauphin Francis, Son of King Henry II of France.  Henry VIII died in 1547 and his 9 year old son Edward came to the throne but he ruled only 9 years before dying.  Mary I (Mary Tudor, daughter of Henry VIII) rose to be Queen of England in 1553 but married Prince Phillip of Spain and returned the country to Catholicism.  After a short reign Mary I died in 1558 and Elizabeth I came to the throne in England.  She immediately reinstated the Church of England with her at the head.

In 1532 King Henry VIII separated from the Roman Catholic Church and formed an Episcopal (of Bishops) church with him at the head.  The lands and riches of the Catholic Church now were in Henry VIII possession.   John Knox was involved in the reformist movement and in 1546 got caught up in the take over of St. Andrews Castle by protestants in which a cardinal was killed.  A year later it was taken back at the request of regent Mary of Guise by the French.  Knox was imprisoned and banished to England in 1549 where he worked with the Church of England. When Mary I took over control of England he was forced to leave and went to Geneva to study.

Clan Hay divided on the religious issue but it has been written that many brothers chose opposing sides to save their lands and titles so the depth of belief versus political expediency is not known.  That said, many held deep religious beliefs for which they were willing to die for.  The northern Hay, the Earl of Errol remained Catholic and many in the southern lowlands reformed to Presbyterianism.  We find reference to the Hays signing the reformation oath, In An Old Kirk Chronicle Waddell writes of the Covenant in Tyninghame (East Lothian), Scotland; “Lauders and Cunninghames, Jacksons and Warts, Kers and Hays, for one day at least lifted above their common toil and out of their jealousies and strife, exalted with a new enthusiasm and bound together by the sacred pledge.” (An Old Kirk Chronicle being a history of Auldhame, Tyninghame, and Whitekirk in East Lothian” by Rev. P. Lately Waddell, B.D. 1818)   

In 1558 Mary married Francis, Dauphin of France and in 1559 he came to the throne of France but lived only one year.  Back in Scotland in 1556 John Knox found that the reformation had taken hold in Scotland with many of the nobility supporting it which kept the Queen regent at bay.  When summoned to Edinburg by the Bishops Knox had so many followers that his hearing was called off.  Knox returned to Geneva but in 1559 came back to Scotland.

Summoned to Edinburg by the Queen Regent, Knox and the protestants instead went to the walled city of Perth.  Preaching at St. John the Baptist Church Knox’s fiery sermon grew into a riot.  A mob attacked the friaries and looted gold and silver.  The Queen Regent offered to allow the protestants to leave the town and promised not to garrison it with French, but when garrisoned with those on the French payroll several nobles left her and joined the protestants.  Knox based himself at St. Andrews and protestant reinforcements were expected coming in against the expected French response.

Knox asked Elizabeth I for assistance as the uprising grew across all of lowland Scotland.  When French troops arrived in Leith the protestants retook Edinburg and in 1559 the Scottish nobility deposed Mary of Guise from the Regency.  Her secretary, William Maitland switched sides and took over government administration and English troops then arrived.  Mary of Guise died suddenly in 1560 which opened the door to an end of hostilities with both the French and English leaving Scotland.

The Scottish Parliament met to settle religious matters and they abolished the jurisdiction of the pope, condemned all doctrine and practice not of the reformed faith, and forbade the celebration of mass in Scotland.  The church, pronounced kirk in Scots, was to be organized by Knox who chose a Presbytery system along democratic lines.  Additionally, the system included plans for national education.  In 1561 Mary, Queen of Scots returned to her throne and 5 days later attended mass.  After a minor incident she issued a proclamation there would be no alteration on the current state of religion.  She met with Knox and a contentious relationship ensued over several meetings over several years.  With nobles support leaning towards Mary, Knox’s influence over political events waned.

In 1565 Mary married Henry Stuart, Lord Darnley, a fellow Catholic, and this caused many Protestant Lords to rebel but the rebellion fizzled out.  Lord Darnley demanded a Crown Matrimonial which would make him a co-sovereign of Scotland and sole ruler if he outlived Mary.  Mary denied it.  When she became pregnant the child was rumored to be her private secretary. Darnley, with a group of Protestant Lords murdered the secretary in front of the pregnant Mary. Darnley switched sides again and with Mary escaped to Edinburg.  In 1566 she gave birth to Charles James, the future James VI of Scotland.  

It was rumored that Mary was having an affair with the Duke of Bothwell.  In 1567 Mary prompted Darnell to return to Edinburg. He stayed at a house in the city walls to recuperate from an illness and Mary visited daily, indicating a reconciliation.  But in the early morning hours an explosion was heard and the house blown up and Darnley was found in the garden, apparently suffocated. Many suspects were reduced to Bothwell and he was charged but not convicted.  In 1567 Bothwell abducted Mary and they were married according to protestant rites, Bothwell having divorced his wife 12 days prior.  

26 Scottish nobles revolted and Mary and Bothwell formed an army to meet theirs.  Facing off, negotiations occurred as Mary’s army dwindled through desertion.  Bothwell was allowed to leave the field and the Lords took Mary to Edinburg where she was imprisoned.  She miscarried twins while imprisoned and was then forced to abdicate in favor of her son with James Stewart, 1st Earl of Moray as Regent.  In 1568 she escaped and raised an army but was defeated by Moray.  Mary escaped to England and her supporters and those of Moray kept battling for control.  Moray was assassinated and the next Regent, James paternal grandfather, was fatally wounded by Mary’s supporters. Several others follow and in 1579 James takes over himself.  

In 1582 at 16 James is taken prisoner but liberated in 1583 and takes increasing control of Scotland.  Kept under house arrest by Elizabeth I, Mary, Queen of Scots was eventually implicated in a plot against Elizabeth and beheaded in 1587.  James married Anne of Denmark in 1589 and proved himself a successful diplomat and administrator, keeping the Lords in line and happy.  In 1586 he signed the Treaty of Berwick setting himself up as successor to the childless queen of England.  

While written history marks the major political and religious events in the stories of the leaders, the population lives the history.  The continuous strife and conflict would leave the tenant farmer in precarious circumstances, barely able to survive, especially in the border region and western lowlands.  Indeed, on the borders the conflict was so bad that farming was almost completely abandoned because of the raids by border reivers. Religious beliefs ran so deep that people were willing to die for them.  Conversion for the farmer would usually follow the choice of the leaders.  In every battle or conflict the tenant farmer would be called to duty such as at Flodden were we see 23 leaders falling, certainly hundreds of Hay’s also met their demise.

Ireland and England

In 1500 Ireland was under a Clan system and Catholic.  England Was trying to assert control over the country by controlling the Clan Chiefs.  Under these chief’s were lesser and sub chief’s who controlled smaller Clans and Septs, mostly Anglo Norman and Hiberno Norman Barons.   In 1534 the Lord Deputy General of Ireland was the 9th Earl of Kildare and he was called to London under charges of disloyalty leaving his son, Thomas Fitzgerald, in charge.  When rumors reached Thomas Fitzgerald that his father had been killed, Fitzgerald renounced allegiance to Henry VIII and swore allegiance to papal authority and he seized Dublin.

Henry’s new Lord Deputy, Sir William Skeffington, retook Dublin and then stormed Fitzgeralds stronghold.  Lacking aid from Scotland or Spain Fitzgerald surrendered.  Over the next year and a half the rebellion was put down and Fitzgerald and 5 uncles were hanged.  Henry VIII solidified his control over the country and in 1541 declared himself King of Ireland reinforced by the Irish Parliament voting in a statute proclaiming him so.

When Elizabeth I came to power she was the Supreme Governor of the Church of Ireland, the Irish Episcopal counterpart to the Church of England.  Papal authority was denied and Catholic Bishops and Priests were persecuted.   She also placed English men in charge of affairs in an effort to control the Lords and Barons.  This led to the Desmond Rebellion in 1569 and the rebellion continued to the Munster Rebellion in 1583 when the rebellion was finally put down with Desmond killed and his 300,000 acres of land escheated.  To further Anglicization of Ireland the lands  were to be broken up into portions up to 12,000 acres and English families would be settled, or “planted” on it.  By 1598 4000 English people had been planted, the first plantation system.   

Hugh O’Neill was orphaned when his father, Fear Dorcha O’Neill, Earl of Tyrone was murdered.  He was raised as an English Gentleman.  He attended court in London and the Irish Parliament and in the Munster Rebellion fought with the English.  In 1587 Hugh O’Neill was given the Title of Earl of Tyrone and so like his father before him carried claim to the O’Neill Gaelic title from the north of Ireland and also the English title of Earl.  He gained control of the O’Neill title in 1592 and with it control of all the O’Neill lands.  In taking the title he had made himself into a ruthless and powerful warlord.  Within his domain the peasantry were treated as serfs and he used their labor to generate cash flow which was then invested in muskets, ammunition, and pikes to arm his military.  

Elizabeth was placing English Sheriff’s throughout Ireland.  She was to grant the freemen, the tenant farmers, property rights to their land and the rent paid to the agents of the queen, thus removing the political and legal control of the Irish Lords.  For O’Neill this meant that he could not muster and maintain his army.  O’Neill was in contact with the King of Spain who was providing money, arms, and military advisors to him.  This while he maneuvered to get himself named Lord President of Ulster.  When he wasn’t so named he openly joined the rebellion against England.

O’Neill’s rebellion slowly turned into a self declared holy war for Irish independence.  The English attacked Ulster and were repelled. The victory caused the rebellion to spread across all of Ireland.  Open rebellion in Munster with the aid of O’Neill’s forces resulted in the Munster Plantation being completely destroyed.  Native Lords who remained loyal to England saw their people side with the rebels.  England, saddled with a war in the Spanish Netherlands was stretched thin.

The Earl of Essex arrived in Ireland with 17,000 troops but he had nothing but disastrous expeditions and ended up signing a humiliating truce with Hugh O’Neill.  Walled up in defensive quarters, disease brought death and a reduction in Essex forces.  He challenged O’Neill to a single combat to settle the war but O’Neill didn’t respond.  The tide began to turn in the South when Munster was retaken.  In the North the English employed a scorched earth policy figuring to deny the rebels food and reinforcements.  And so as they went about they killed, burned, and destroyed all they came across sparing neither woman or child.    

In 1601 the Spanish finally arrived with 3000 troops in Kinsale in the South.  English Commander Mountjoy with 7000 went to meet them.  O’Neill marched from the North to sandwich the English between two forces. Irish foot soldiers were met by English cavalry and routed and several hundred killed.  The Spanish and Irish withdrew and the Spanish surrendered under terms, being allowed to return to Spain.  The Irish then began to withdraw north to defend Ulster.  The question now was what terms the Irish could get in their losing battle.

O’Neill was reduced to guerrilla tactics as the English armies now swept across Ireland burning and killing as they went.  The destruction caused famine so deep that the locals resorted to cannibalism.  O’Neill’s sub Lords began to surrender under terms and by 1603 O’Neill himself surrendered under terms to Mountjoy.  O’Neill and the other lords received full pardons and abandon their Irish titles but keep the English ones.  In 1604 Mountjoy pardoned all rebels.  The war left England bankrupt.  In addition, English and Welsh men conscripted to fight the war suffered 30,000 dead.  O’Neill reported 70,000 dead in action.  Over the countryside 100,000 died from war, disease, and starvation which was 10% of the population of Ireland then.  The land lay waste, Ulster was totally destroyed.   

European powers and rulers in 1600

In 1603 Queen Elizabeth died and James the VI of Scotland was crowned James I of England thus he controlled England, Scotland, and Ireland.  

The Netherlands in 1500 were ruled by the Catholic Habsburgs from Spain and control eventually given to Philip II.  Over time the country became more Protestant with the reformation and in 1566 mobs rioted and smashed churches and Philip II sent an army to restore order but instead it formed a police state.  A popular uprising begins and William the Orange takes control of the uprising and war with Spain starts.  William of Orange was assassinated in 1584 and the crown offered to Henry III of France and Elizabeth I of England but both decline but do send military assistance.   

The provinces in the north were Calvanist and supported religious toleration.  Those in the south were Catholic and supported reconciliation with Spain.  In 1588 the seven northern provinces set themselves up as a republic with each province independent appointing their own stadholder and having one vote in a states general which needs to vote unanimously.  The Stadholder in Holland and Zeeland is the son of William of Orange, Maurice of Nassau and he is appointed stadholder in 3 more provinces giving his a lot of control.  He forms an army and navy and pushes Spain south.   

In 1596 both France and England recognize the new republic but it won’t be until the end of the 30 years war and and peace with Spain that Netherlands is formally divided from the south Spanish Netherlands, today known as Belgium.  The Stadholder in 1600 was Frederick Henry of the House of Orange.  

France in the 1500’s was at war with Italy in the early part of the century and also impacted by the reformation starting mid century.  French Protestants, called Huguenots, were brutally suppressed and France was in a state of civil war from 1562 to 1598 over religion until the Edict of Nantes supported religious toleration.  The King of France was Henry IV of the House of Bourbon as we start the 1600s.  

Spain in the 1500’s was building the first global empire and one of the largest in world history.    Isabella I and Ferdinand II authorized the Columbus expedition in 1492.  In 1516 Charles I, Holy Emperor was the King of Spain and the Holy Roman Emperor.  In addition to vast European holdings, Spain conquered the empires of Mexico and South America and also the Philippine Islands among other locations.  In 1556 he abdicated and Philip II became King of Spain (Rome went to his brother Ferdinand).  Philip II married Mary I of England but her death prevented any control of that nation by him.  War with the Netherlands and England in the latter half of the century drained his treasury and the Spanish Armada incident in 1588 weakened his navy.  The plague hit Spain at the end of the century and Philip II died in 1598.  The King of Spain in 1600 was Philip III of the House of Habsburg.  

The decisions of these Monarch’s and their governments and their successors would greatly impact my Hays ancestors movement from Scotland to Ireland in the 1600s and to North America in the 1700s.