Wit and Wisdom

Eastern America; Northeast, Southeast and Canada 1500-1600.

There is little known about the native populations east of the Mississippi River in 1500.  Much of what we do know comes from oral histories presented to European sources in the 1600s.  When the last ice age receded the land bridge between the Americas and other continents was cut off.  So unlike Europe and Asia which developed trade and exchange of ideas, America was left to itself and it missed improvements in farming,  manufacture and written languages.  The natives east of the Mississippi were a stone age tribal society of hunter-gatherers or farming combined with hunter-gathering.  

Algonquian (i.e. Pequots, Narragansettes, Leni Lenape, Mahican), Siouan (i.e., Catawba, Sioux, Biloxi), and Iroquois (i.e. Mohawk, Huron, Susquehannock) were the three main language families east of the Mississippi in the north, Muskogean (i.e. Creek, Chickasaw, Alabama) is in the southeast but there were multiple sub dialects for the various tribes for all language groups.  For our purposes I divide the tribes into two areas, the Northeast tribes and the Southeast Tribes.  The Northeast covers the area north of the Ohio River around the Great Lakes to the Atlantic Ocean and south to the Susquehanna River Valley and coastal Virginia.  The Southeast includes the area south of the Ohio River and from the Mississippi River to the Atlantic Ocean including the Gulf of Mexico Coast.

These varied tribes were often at war with each other pushed by conflict over resources and past or present offenses.  The primary farming tribes were the Iroquois Tribes but all tribes were combined hunters, gatherers, and farmers according to the local climate and resources.  Northeast Rivers provided fish and northern frost killed crops so they relied more on the former.  Western fringe tribes had an abundance of Buffalo and so relied more on hunting.  But all northeast tribes were familiar with “the 3 sisters,” corn, beans, and squash.  Algonquian and Siouan (leaning towards hunter-gatherer) tribes built wickiups (wigwams), a 20’ round pole house made of a wood frame covered in woven mats or bark with a single fire in the center which held a 3 generation family.  Iroquoian’s (leaning more to farming and hunter-gathering) built longhouses, 20+ feet wide and 40 to 400 feet long using material similar to the wickiups.  Fires were placed in the center walkway and interior walls were built to divide areas for nuclear families, holding from 5 to 10 families in each longhouse. 

Prior to European contact all tribes wore clothes made from animals hides.  Men wore a breech cloth, leggings and a cape in cold weather.  Women wore a skirt, legging and a cape in cold weather and both wore moccasins.  Weapons of war and hunting were the bow and arrow, tomahawk, lance, and war club with arrowheads and knives made of flint.  They made armor and defensive shields of wood.  They trapped with snares, foot hold traps (made of wood), and deadfall traps.  Fish were caught in weirs and speared.  Land for farming and also hunting grounds were cleared by burning and trees were felled by girdling it or burning it all around.

Generally, most Tribes were broken up into Clans with Clan Chiefs beholden to the Tribal Chief, a hierarchal tribal system.  Marriage occurred across Clans within a Tribe but not within a Clan, offering genetic diversity and also promoting unity between Clans.  Marriage was a loose contract among the young but more so monogamous with the older persons.  The right of inheritance was within the Mothers Clan so a male child born to a Clan Princess had rights to hierarchy in her Clan and not his fathers.  The primary male responsible for a male child was the mothers brother and the rest of the adult males.  Woman controlled decision making in most of the internal workings of the Clan and men held decision making for external matters such as war, setting or moving Tribes and Clans living spaces, etc.  Given similarities, there was variation and no standard across the many tribes.

When Europeans made contact with the native tribes they brought diseases which the natives had no immunity too.  The larger farming villages (the Iroquoian tribes) were hit harder by these diseases due to greater contact between the their people but none of the tribes escaped these plagues.   Raiding other tribes and taking slaves, who were often made a part of that tribe, to replace lost members to disease or warfare, was common and with the reduction in numbers of tribesmen greater pressure was put upon tribes to replace losses.

The earliest contact with Europeans was in the first decade of 1500 as English, French, and Spanish fishermen started fishing in the vicinity of the Grand Banks off of present day Newfoundland.  Proof of this was found in a Huron Village excavation by archeologists in present day Whitchurch-Stouffville in Ontario, Canda (located north of Toronto).  Dating to 1500, the site was named the Mantle and covered over 10 acres and held 98 longhouses and held between 1500-1800 people.  This is 5 times larger than the average Iroquoian village size of that time.  Additionally part of an axe was found ceremonially buried and an investigation into the source of it revealed it came from the Basque region in Spain.  The Curse of the Axe is a documentary of the find.  Unfortunately, transfer of iron from tribe to tribe most likely marked the transfer of European diseases.

Spanish Conquest:

Diego Riberio Map of North America 1520

In 1513 Ponce de Leon landed on the coast of Florida and claimed it for Spain.  At the time the Calusa Tribe controlled southwest Florida.  Described as a warlike tribe, Calusa meaning “fierce people,” they were also good sailors using Cypress dugouts and traveling as far as Cuba in them.  They would have been familiar with he poor treatment of natives by the Spanish.  Ponce de Leon returned in 1521 landing on the western side of Florida.  Put upon by the Calusa de Leon was wounded most likely by a poison arrow.  The expedition sailed back to Cuba where Ponce de Leon died. 

In 1526 Lucas Vasquez de Ayllon took 600 to settle in the Americas.   In 1504 de Ayllon landed at Hispaniola (Present day Haiti and Dominican Republic) and gained wealth and power then he married into a prominent Caribbean family.  In 1521 de Ayllon financed an expedition to gather slaves in the Bahamas but finding it depopulated the expedition turned northwest in search of land rumored to be in the region.  They landed at Winyah Bay in present day South Carolina and took 60 slaves from the Cofitachequi Tribe.  An Indian named “Francisco de Chicora” learned Spanish and came to be owned by de Ayllon.  Reports from the expedition and Chicora told de Ayllon stories about his homeland and its riches.   De Ayllon brought Chicora to Spain and secured  a contract with the King to establish a settlement.   

Landing at Winyah Bay the 600 men, including some women, children, and African slaves, they then continued south to an unknown location where they established a town.  Most of the inhabitants succumbed to cold, hunger, disease, and conflict with natives.  When de Ayllon died the surviving colonists broke into factions fighting over control.  After only 3 months the 150 survivors abandoned the settlement and returned to Hispaniola. The African slaves ran off and settled with the natives.

In 1527 the Spanish Narvaez expedition led by Panfilo de Narvaez, intending to establish a colony in Mexico, was hit by a hurricane and landed on the West coast of Florida north of Tampa Bay.  He landed 300 men ashore and there was some trading of goods with local natives and they advised him he could find food and gold to the North.  They continued north on foot and the remaining ships were to follow by sea, but the parties were never to find each other.  Narvaez attacked the next village he came to and took prisoners.  As they continued the natives began to attack them by setting ambushes. 

By using ambushes the natives negated the Spanish advantages of gunpowder, armor, and horses.  They could get off 5 arrows to one from the Spanish crossbows or before an arquebus could be loaded and fired. Their bows weren’t strong enough to penetrate the armor but they learned to shoot at the soft spot, the neck and lower body not covered by armor.  Forest terrain  provided concealment and also prevented the use of horses to run them down.  The Spanish advantages worked best in open fields such as around the settlements.

Over the next 3 months they found the villages deserted and as they moved they were under constant ambushes.  They decided to build boats and sail to Mexico and for the next month turned their armor into tools and built boats.  Disease, starvation, and attacks had reduced their number to 242 when they sailed.  Storms, thirst, and starvation reduced the expedition to 80 and they were hit by a hurricane and driven apart and landed in various spots in present day TX.   One party was attacked and killed by natives but two others met friendly natives who brought them food and water.  Reduced to about 160 men they decided to winter over in TX. 

Their numbers dwindled over the next 4 years and by 1542 only 4 were left alive held captive by a native tribe.  The 4 escaped and walked northwest, along the Rio Grande turning West and then south eventually hitting the Gulf of California and going along the West coast of Mexico.  Unlike many of the eastern coastal tribes which were hostile to the Spanish the interior tribes treated them as honored guests.  They were escorted from village to village and in 1536 arrived at the Spanish frontier outpost at Culiacan Central west coast of present day Mexico) and thus ended the Narvaez expedition.   

In 1539 Hernando De Soto sailed from Cuba in 5 ships and landed in Florida, present day Tampa Bay, with an army of 1000 men and 350 horses.   Landing 300 on shore, they were attacked by the natives at dawn but drove the attackers away.  As with the Narvaez expedition the natives would attack the Spanish in ambush.  When counter attacked they retreated away from the armored soldiers and horsemen.  But as soon as they turned the natives would again attack.  As De Soto’s expedition progressed they encountered increasing resistance.  De Soto then learned of a Spaniard in the custody of a native tribe.

A party from Narvaez ships had gone to shore and was put upon by the natives with 4 taken prisoner to Chief Ucita.  3 were slowly killed by arrows and the 4th was stretched over a fire to be burned to death but his screams caused the Chief’s daughter to take pity on him and he was removed from the fire.  Knowing at some point that her father would put him to death she spirited the Spaniard, Juan Ortiz, to a neighboring tribe where she had close relations to the Chief, Mocoso.  When Ortiz was given safety Chief Ucita aligned with neighboring tribes against Chief Mocoso.

De Soto learned of this and sent a party of lancers into Mocoso’s lands to retrieve his fellow Spaniard.  But Ortiz had also leaned of De Soto and was given leave to go find him with an escort to assure his safety on the condition that Ortiz entreat De Soto to not lay waste to his territory or harm his people.  The parties came upon each other and the lancers advanced and the natives fled, save one who announced himself as a Spanish Christian.  De Soto now had an interpreter and a person with knowledge of the natives.

De Soto’s expedition, like Narvaez before him, was met with constant harassment by arrows as it moved.  Taking some natives prisoner, the Spaniards turned their dogs loose on them causing a brutal death.  At the next village De Soto sent to the Chief for a friendly chat, the Chief responded he wanted no friendship, “War only, and never-ending shall be waged against the invaders of our soil,” said the Chief.  

It was De Soto’s practice to take a Chief captive to obtain the support of his tribe.  He did so with 3 brothers who were Chief’s of 3 tribes.  But one hatched a plan of resistance and put up 10,000 warriors against De Soto’s 1000 thinking that 10 to 1 in numbers would overcome the armor of the Spaniards.   By the end of several days of fighting the land was left in desolation and 1300 warriors had been killed in battle.   As De Soto moved the natives continued to harass and several were killed at each assault and some taken prisoner and put in chains and used as carriers.  If the natives fled their village upon approach the Spaniards would just use the abandoned houses for shelter and harvest the planted crops.  It was De Soto’s plan to winter in Apalachee on the Florida panhandle.

The Apalachee tribe had met the Spanish at the Narvaez expedition and were familiar with firearm, horse, crossbow, and armor.  Upon approaching the village the battle began and ran on for 2 days with the Spaniards pushing forward slowly.  They came upon a palisade manned by many Apalachee warriors.  The heavily armed dismounted horsemen were able to breach it and put the natives to flight.  The Spaniards set up a camp but the natives continued to assault it all night, this now the 4th night of battle.  De Soto and his horsemen assaulted the stronghold of the Chief, capturing him and securing his winter quarters.

De Soto made contact with his ships and sent them west to find a harbor, which they did.  Reporting back to him they found one in present day Pensacola, De Soto kept a road open between it and Apalachee.  The Apalachee themselves refused to surrender and De Soto’s men were ambushed everywhere they went. Expeditions in the surrounding country failed to reveal any gold or riches to plunder. Hearing stories of riches to the North and west De Soto was to move on. 

De Soto was met by the Chief of the next tribe who advised they had no gold or riches.  He offered 400 of his people as porters in addition to provisions for his men.  The following Chief, Patofa, met De Soto in peace and allowed his army to pass.  He offered four thousand warriors and 4000 carriers to De Soto as he was in conflict with the neighboring tribe which was De Soto’s objective hearing it had gold.   An expedition of 9000 started but was so large in 7 days food became scarce, and discipline began to unravel with each leader employing a heavy hand of punishment on those who failed them.  Finally they came upon a well provisioned town with few inhabitants and plundered it, but every captured prisoner claimed to not to know of any other towns in the vicinity, save one native who caved in under threat of being burned alive.

De Soto’s Indian allies went ahead of him and as De Soto came to the next several towns he found all inhabitants had been killed and scalped.  He sent horsemen to get Patofa to return to him as he wanted to first try to befriend the next chief and if that didn’t work then resort to hostage taking or conquest if the former didn’t work.  Patofa was sent back to his village, happy to go as his tribe had gathered hundreds of scalps as vengeance for past assaults.  

De Soto continued on with 100 horsemen and meeting a warrior advised he came in peace.  The warrior agreed to relay the message to his queen.  She met with De Soto and offered shelter and provisions in her town.  Not too far distant was an abandoned town which was vacated due to a pestilence, most likely an imported European disease.  De Soto also found in this town breast plates, axes, armor, and beads which he believed was from an ill fated expedition by Vasquez de Ayllon to the South Carolina coast to form a settlement.  The town was on the Savannah River within days of the coast.  De Soto found no gold but many pearls, about 14 bushels, many taken off of dead Chiefs in their burial grounds.  

When De Soto asked for carriers and guides for his expedition the queen refused, disgusted at the behavior of the Spaniard guests in raiding the graves, and De Soto then took her captive.  They travelled north and then northwest 300 miles into Cherokee territory. Fearing she would not be released as promised the queen took flight and managed to elude capture.  De Soto was saddened, not by the loss of the queen but by the loss of a chest of pearls, those in perfect and valuable condition.  

The next Chief offered De Soto corn and provisions and shelter in his village of about 300 houses.  With ample provisions in a rich and fertile land, De Soto stayed to fatten his horses and rest his men.  Searches in the nearby mountains again revealed no gold, just some copper.   In lieu of robbing the graves for more pearls De Soto had the Chief show him how they are obtained.   Mussels, in abundance, were collected from the streams and placed on the coals of hardwood fires to open them.  The pearls were removed and the meat of the mussels used to prepare many dishes for their dinner. It now midsummer, De Soto took his leave before exhausting all provisions of the tribe.

The next Chief met De Soto and his advance party with 1500 warriors.  Before they could secure De Soto as a prisoner his army arrived and it was the Chief who was taken.  The Chief was then released on the promise of assistance and they built rafts and boats which De Soto used to cross a river into present day Alabama.  Passing from village to village De Soto was met with hospitality at each village which offered provisions and carriers and so they passed through the land. Arriving at the main village De Soto was met in peace but took the Chief and his sister hostage for safety traveling to the ends of his lands where he released him but kept his sister hostage. 

De Soto passed into Choctaw territory (Alabama and Mississippi) and met the Chief Tuscaloosa.  Tuscaloosa was 7 feet tall and an impressive figure.  Offering peace, De Soto noticed he was often in consult with sub chiefs and many warriors were arriving.  De Soto took him hostage but allowed him to ride along on horseback with a large pack horse the only one big enough to carry his large frame.  They crossed the Alabama River on rafts headed to Mauvila, the Chiefs stronghold.  It was the Chiefs intent to amass his warriors and take the Spaniards there.  Tuscaloosa continued to provide provisions and carriers but several incidents, including the disappearance of 2 of De Soto’s men made it apparent the Chief was planning something.  De Soto hoped to avoid conflict, rest in Mauvila, then strike south to Pensacola to meet his ships which were supposed to bring provisions.  

Mauvila was located at the confluence of the Alabama and Tombigbee Rivers.  It was more of a fortress than a town with palisade walls planted in the ground and tied together.  At every 50 paces there were holes cut to allow darts and arrows to be shot through and the fortress held 90 houses capable of holding 750 people each.  It contained two gates and the land around the fort was cleared of trees and brush.  De Soto entered with the Chief, having only his advance party fo about 100 men.  De Soto saw the ruse to lure him in but lacked the men to do otherwise.  Inside the fort was filled with 10,000 warriors and no women or children, with towers and walls manned by heavily armed warriors. 

De Soto was shown his quarters and those of his party and advised his army could encamp outside the walls, thus splitting his army.  When De Soto asked Tuscaloosa to stay with him for the noon meal he replied he was tired of De Soto’s company and this was his land and not De Soto’s.  De Soto could go in peace but the Chief would be staying in his stronghold and with that took his leave.  De Soto sent a messenger to get Tuscaloosa for the noon day meal which was ignored twice.  On the third the messenger shouted loudly and a warrior came out of the door and confronted the messenger angrily.

Another warrior behind him placed bow and arrow in his hand and he made out as if to fire at a crowd of Spaniards.  A cavalier then took sword in hand and cut him down, dead.  He was put upon by the warriors son who fired 6 arrows quickly, which bounced off his armor.  He then put upon him striking the helmet with the bow and causing blood to flow and he was also then put to the sword and killed and the Spanish party retreated. The 10,000 warriors then came out of the houses and attacked the Spaniards.

De Soto made it to his horse and even though shot in the thigh rallied his men away from the walls to lure the warriors away and then counter attacked.  Over 9 hours the battle raged with many Spaniards killed and many more warriors slaughtered.  De Soto managed to make it to the gate and outside the fortress and the warriors closed the gate.  Tuscaloosa expected to wait out the Spaniards and attack them in the forest but on arrival at the fortress the carriers had brought all the Spaniards equipment, plunder, and supplies inside the fort.  Also several soldiers were still inside the fort, trapped in one of the houses.

De Soto attacked one of the gates with 200 men, 100 with shields and battle axes, 100 with lances and swords.  They mowed down the gate and advanced to the house holding the hostages, killing hundreds of warriors in the process.  They then set the place on fire, which quickly spread from house to house and tower burning all. The Spaniards retreated to a nearby field.  The warrior attacked, were repulsed, and attacked again.  Dead and wounded warriors numbered 3000 while the Spaniards lost 80 men and forty horses.  

The spaniards stayed there for a month resting and caring for the wounded.  De Soto received word that the ships with supplies made it too Pensacola but kept it from his men.  The consensus of the men is that they should return to Pensacola and take ship out of North America as there was no plunder and riches to be gained in this country of half naked savages.   Consulting his officers, De Soto learned that to return to Pensacola he would lose the support of his men to continue the expedition.  De Soto looked to his own self interest not wanting to return empty handed and a failure, and ordered the expedition to go north and continue on.

After five days the expedition found themselves on a wide river with 1500 warriors on the other side.  When De Soto offered peace to the Chief he responded he wanted a war of fire and blood as he had heard of the destruction of Mauvila.  After 12 days of building rafts the Spaniards crossed and made quick work of decimating the warriors.  Traveling on they came into the lands of the Chickasaw.  Here De Soto befriended a Chief and was given shelter and provisions.  But conflict started almost immediately with 3 Indians caught raiding the Spaniards swine, two were killed and the 3rd had his hands cut off.  The Chief did not complain, but when 2 Spaniards were caught stealing furs from the Chief’s hut he demanded the same treatment which De Soto ordered.  However, the translator advised the Chief De Soto wanted the men pardoned and the Chief did so.

One dark and stormy night warriors passed the Spaniard sentinels and set fire to the huts they inhabited.  They were driven out into battle with the warriors.  The warriors were eventually repulsed but not before De Soto lost 40 men in the flames, all his swine which were burned in the fort, as were 50 horses in addition to all their supplies and provisions.  Many were naked having not time to gather their clothes and now had to spend the night outside on a cold march night.  They moved off a distance and made a forge and bellows with a bear hide to re-temper their words damaged in the fire, built lances and saddle horns of ash and shields from buffalo hides and in a week were on the march again.

In 3 days they came upon another group, naked with fully painted bodies for war, they stood behind palisades.  The warriors erred in leaving their fortress and the Spaniards routed them, sending them in retreat and in hast they became stuck in the narrow entrance and were cut down.  The Spaniards then gained the interior and a great carnage ensued. The location was most likely near the Yazoo River in Mississippi.  De Soto continued northerly and in 8 days came to the Mississippi River.

De Soto went to the nearest village and asked for time to build vessels to cross the Mississippi on.  The Chief replied he was under another Chief who would want them to war but De Soto advised he would not harm or ravage the province and he was not attacked.  In making his vessels the party was approached and attacked by water. Raiding parties rained arrows down on them but when it was apparent it wouldn’t stop the work the party withdrew.  A party of 7000 warriors, Sioux, appeared on the opposite shore as De Soto crossed in 4 barges and but were defeated on the Spanish landing.  The expedition  continued on meeting a friendly tribe, the Chief Casqui.

De Soto continued his quest for gold with Casqui and 5000 warriors and 3000  baggage bearers along.  Prior to arrival at the neighboring town controlled by Chief Capaha, Casqui went forward with select warriors to scout but in actuality to attack an enemy he had lost many battles to.  Casqui and his warriors killed many and desecrated the burial ground of his enemies; remains were pulled from coffins and heads of his defeated warriors were taken down from poles and replaced with the heads of his new victims.  Thus for the second time De Soto was befriended to involve him in the tribal politics of the area.

Capaha had removed to an island and peace offerings from De Soto were declined.  De Soto attacked in 70 canoes supplied by Casqui with 200 of his men and 3000 of Casqui’s.  Upon arriving at the island the force could barely make shore due to the great defense of Capaha’s warriors.  Faced with strong opposition the 3000 of Casqui’s warriors fled in their canoes leaving the Spaniards to certain destruction.  They were saved only when Capaha called for a cessation and offered De Soto peace.   De Soto was able to broker a peace between the two Chief’s but Capaha advised Casqui that he was victorious only because of the Spaniards and that they would leave at some point but he would still be there, a warning of future retribution.

De Soto continued to wander looking for gold and wintered over his third year.  Losing his interpreter made the going harder and he was down to 400 efficient men and forty horses.  Finally De Soto gave up his westward march and looked to return to the Mississippi and build 2 Brigantines, one to go to Cuba and the other Mexico to get supplies for the expedition.  The more he moved the more hostile Indians he encountered.  He went to the Arkansas River, a tributary to the Mississippi River and down to the Mississippi.  Finding a friendly Chief De Soto settled into his care for shelter and provisions.

But nightly the Chief and warriors would cross the Mississippi River, De Soto suspecting he was making alliances with neighboring tribes.  It was here that De Soto became ill and died.  Luis de Moscoso was put in charge before De Soto died and he feared to let the Indians know of the death as they thought De Soto was immortal.  Moscoso had De Soto secretly buried but several warriors suspected the sick De Soto had been buried there so Moscoso moved the body and put it in the Mississippi River.

The remaining Spaniards were hopeful that De Soto’s death would mean a movement to return to Cuba but Mosco decided to continue the quest and marched for a year in a long circle leaving any place the Spaniards went in death and destruction as their numbers decreased also.  Finally he returned to the place of De Soto’s death.  Knowing they now wanted to leave the natives provided shelter and provisions as they set about attempting to build ships.  Finding 30 spies from a neighboring tribe in his camp Moscoso cut off their hands and sent them home mutilated.

The summer of 1543 the Spaniards finished building their vessels and with only 350 men left in the expedition embarked down the Mississippi assuming it would take them to the Gulf of Mexico.  It was here the Chief of the mutilated Indians would get his revenge as fleets of canoes with thousands of warriors put upon the Spaniards.  All but 8 of the horses were killed and just about every Spaniard wounded.  On the 4th day 4 of the vessels were cut off and 48 killed or drowned. A couple days later they landed to graze the last of the horses and lost them, killed by arrows with the handlers barely escaping the attack.  The Spaniards finally suffered greater losses than their assailants and after 16 days of assault the Indians left.

They made it to the Gulf and decided to push out to sea instead of holding to the shore.  A gale hit, scattered them, and pushed them back to shore and they spent 2 months slowly navigating the shore line before returning to civilization.  De Soto’s ships waited in Pensacola until it apparent he was not returning.  They came back every year and sailed the Gulf looking for information on the party, finally learning of its failure and losses from word spread by the arrival of the remains of the expedition in Mexico.    

In 1535 Esteban Gomez explored the eat coast of North America from Florida to Maine and the Penobscot Bay looking for the Northwest passage.  Finding no route to the riches of the East he took a load of slaves from the natives, most likely one of the Abenaki tribes in Maine, and returned them to Spain to be sold.  It was common for explorers to take natives hostage as slaves to be sold, guides, or future interpreters.   

1559 Tristan de Luna landed at Pensacola Bay in an effort to establish a base of support to establish a colony on Santa Elena (Parr’s Island).  It was it by a hurricane which killed many and sank 6 ships, grounded a 7th, and ruined supplies.  Survivors moved inland (present day Alabama) for several months then returned to the coast.  Finally in 1561 the effort to settle was abandoned concluding northwest Florida was too dangerous to settle and it was ignored for over 100 years. 

French and Spanish conflict:

In 1562 French Huguenots settled Charlesfort on Parr’s Island, South Carolina.  Looking to secure a piece of America for France, 28 men were left on Parr’s Island, South Carolina, to build a settlement and their leader, Jean Ribault, returning to France to secure supplies but he was arrested by the English and imprisoned for 2 years preventing his return.  The Orista and Guale Tribes originally supplied the colony but when their provisions were severely taxed they withdrew support.  A mutiny occurred due to strict discipline and most of their supplies were burned. They built their own open boat  and all but one sailed back towards Europe.  Lacking supplies they were reduced to cannibalism before being rescued by an English Vessel.  The Spanish came from Cuba and burned the fort and took captive the one Frenchman who was living with local Indians. 

Santa Elena.  The Spanish built a fort on top of the French fort, San Felipe, in 1566 and occupied it until 1570 when it was destroyed by fire.  They built a second fort nearby, San Felipe II, to house 250 troops which arrived from Spain.  In 1566 225 settlers, farmers and families and Catholic Missionaries, arrived from Spain.  In 1577, due to cruel treatment, the Guale and Orista Tribes attacked the settlement together and it was abandoned.   In 1577 the French returned and their ship wrecked in Port Royal Sound so they built a fort but were put upon by the natives and many killed and the rest captured.  The Spanish returned, attacked the Guale and Orista’s and secured the French from their captors then promptly hanged most of them.  The Spanish built Fort San Marcos and then a second larger fort nearby but they abandoned it in 1587 in favor of St. Augustine after learning of Sir Walter Raliegh’s Roanoke Island settlement and  fearing an attack by the English Sir Francis Drake operating in the Caribbean and attacking Spanish settlements. 

About 1564 300 French Huguenots sailed to Florida to settle, hold the land for France, and drive out the Spanish. They settled at the mouth of the St. John’s River building a triangle shaped fort there, Fort Caroline.  Initially they got along with the Timucua Indians but when their supplies ran short they looked to the natives who declined causing conflict.  To counter this French Protestant settlement Phillip II of Spain sent Pedro Menendez de Avilez and 600 men to Florida.  Unknown to them Ribault had been freed and was returning to Florida with provisions for the Huguenots.

Menendez was badly beaten by storms but managed to reach Florida with 5 ships only to find Ribault already there.  In 1565 Menendez founded St. Augustine and began to build earthworks and a fort.  Menendez fleet couldn’t compete with Ribault’s and he sent away his larger ships.  Ribault emptied Fort Caroline of most of the men looking to strike the Spaniards and drive them from Florida.  Menendez noticed a heavy storm coming and proceeded overland with a part of his force to attack Fort Caroline.  Not expecting an attack in foul weather the fort was easily taken as the few raining men were getting out of bed in the morning.   Mendez put all the men to death by sword.  Menendez returned to St. Augustine to learn that the 2 vessels of the French fleet had been wrecked in the storm and the rest scattered.  Survivors on the beach surrendered to Menendez and he offered them life to convert to Catholicism, which few did, and 111 were put to the sword.  A second party was found with Ribault and all were put to death.  

The Spanish were mostly men and turned to the Timucua for food and wives.  This caused conflict between them and the Timucua began to attack the Spanish to try to drive them out.  Menendez established Santa Elena as his Capital and St. Augustine was used primarily as a fort.  Over time it grew and was settled but it suffered many disasters.  And in 1586 Sir Francis Drake burned St. Augustine to the ground.  Spain decided to consolidate holdings and in 1587 abandoned Santa Elena and made St. Augustine the Capital of Florida.  Short of food they were saved by Dona Maria Melendez, a Timucua ruler of an Indian mission town and a Christian (as was her mother) and she had married one of the Spanish soldiers.  Being part of the hereditary elite class she was respected by the Spanish.  Her son was to become the Chief of another Indian mission Town. 

Marriage with native women was common in the Spanish colonies due to the lack of women.  The class system was royalty (anyone with a connection to royalty); then a peninsular, a person born in Spain; criollos, a Spanish person born in the Americas; mixed races; and Africans.  The cultures also became mixed, part native Timucua and part Spanish.  Catholic missionaries and the establishment of mission towns was spreading Christianity and also the mixed cultures in Florida and West Florida.     

France in Canada

In 1534 French navigator Jacques Cartier was looking for the Northwest Passage when he discovered the Gulf of St. Lawrence and the St. Lawrence River.  He would return in 1535 and sail the St. Lawrence to the city of Hochelaga.  Here he took 2 sons of the Chief back to France with him.  Cartier returned to North America in 1536 and guided by the 2 natives he had brought back sailed up the St. Lawrence River and established a base near an Iroquois Village.  From there he proceeded further upriver to Montreal and a 2nd Iroquois Village but returned to his base the same day.  Wintering over they lost 25 men to disease during a cold, brutal winter.  They also began to have conflicts with the locals and when spring arrived Cartier took several Chief’s hostage and returned to France.

In 1541 Cartier was to lead another expedition, this one including Jean-Francois de la Roque de Robal to establish a colony to secure french claims over those of Spain.  Cartier sailed first and settled in Quebec, Roberval was delayed for one year.  They suffered another bitter winter and again the actions of the Europeans raised the hostilities of the local natives. Cartier found what he thought were gold and diamonds and that spring sailed for France only to meet Roberval en route and be ordered back.  Cartier stole away and returned to France only to find the gold and diamonds were worthless minerals.  Roberval spent one winter in Canada then abandoned the colony.  The land was called “Canada” by Cartier after the Mohawk word for town or village.

Iroquois, Huron, Algonquin, Delaware, Susquehannock, Neutrals, Wenronhronon, and Mohicans:  

The Mohawk Indians:

There are differing views on which tribe of Iroquois Cartier met at Montreal.  Some claim it to be the Mohawk and some the Hurons.  Many believing that the Mohawk are related to the Huron and split from that tribe.  There can be no definitive answer as to the tribes in this area as at that time it broke out in war shortly after the visit and tribal lands were changed for all due to the conflict.  According to spoken history to the Champlain Party in 1603, the Algonquin Tribe (an Algonquian speaking tribe) and the Mohawk Tribe (Iroquoian) were at peace in the St. Lawrence Valley.  3 Mohawks were killed by 6 Algonquins when hunting together.  The Algonquins refused redress and the Mohawks swore and oath to perish to a man or have revenge.

Mohawk tradition is that they were driven from the St.Lawrence Valley by the “Adirondacks,” a derogatory name for the Algonquins used by the Mohawks.  With their numbers reduced the Mohawks withdrew to the mountains in Vermont east of Lake Champlain and built their strength and numbers before attacking again.  When put upon the Algonquins asked the Huron for assistance and they joined in.  The Hurons suffered greatly in the battles as they sat between the Mohawk and the Algonquins.   Most likely weakened by war and disease, the Mohawks themselves moved south along Lake George to the Hudson River then west into the Mohawk Valley.  

As discussed in “Eastern American Geography Guiding Settlement” the area where the Mohawk settled is a crossing point for north-south travel and also travel west to the Great Lakes and ultimately the Ohio River Valley.  Originally the area was unsettled as the location would put a tribe in conflict with all using the routes west and North-South, the Mahicans in the Hudson River Valley and the Albany NY area south to the Catskill Mountains, The Algonquins in the Ottawa River Valley (Montreal to Kingston, Canada), and the Huron Tribes southwest of the Algonquins and north of Lake Ontario.  Additionally, the Mohawk were in conflict with (east to west) the Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga, and Seneca Tribes.

The Great Peace (Dekanawida and Hiawatha) and the Iroquois Federation:  

Some references have the Federation occurring in the mid 1500s while most have it occurring about 1570-80 and some later.  If a life was taken between the tribes tribute had to be negotiated, often a life for a life, slavery to the offended family for loss of labor, or tribute, and if not agreed to then retribution would be brought against the offending tribe and so it went back and forth.  The oral tradition of the Iroquois Confederacy tells the story of “The Great Peacemakers” which brought the Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga, and Seneca together.  They instituted The Great Law outlining the rights and responsibilities of the 5 Nations Federation.  Each nation maintained their own internal control but in matters between Nations and in matters concerning other Nations the Federation Council ruled. Tribute for loss of life was a settled matter of law ending the feuds back and forth.

The Federation is important as now hunting lands were held in common as was defense of the Federation against outside enemies.  The Mohawk claimed control of the area just north of Albany, NY around Lake George and Lake Champlain and north to the St. Lawrence River, the Cayuga a rectangle just north of the PA border to the St. Lawrence River, the Onondaga a rectangle from north of the PA line to Lake Ontario, the Oneida a rectangle from north of the PA line to Lake Ontario, and the Seneca a flat top triangle at Lake Ontario to almost the PA border.   While the claimed territory was difficult for the Federation to control at the edges in the 1500s the east-west pass through the Appalachian Mountain Range, the Mohawk River was in complete control of the Federation as was access to the Susquehanna and Delaware River headwaters and access from them to the Schoharie Creek and Mohawk River junction to points north and west.

The Mohawks, Onondagas, and Senecas were the elder brothers of the Iroquois Federation,  the Oneidas and Cayugas the younger brothers. The Mohawks were given precedence as the first of the older brothers and speculation is that they were the descendants of the original tribe from which the others branched out.  Each tribe was divided by clans and marriages did not occur within the same clan.  Rights were passed down maternally and so a father from the wolf clan marrying a mother from the turtle clan would have offspring living in the turtle clan and grow to hold positions in that clan.  The primary male to a son would be his uncle and the rest of the males in the clan.

By 1600 the Algonquins were located north of the upper St. Lawrence River just north of the Mohawk lands.  The Huron were located on the lower St. Lawrence River and north of Lake Ontario and bordering the all 5 Iroquois tribes.  The Mahicans (Mohicans) were located in the Hudson River Valley above NYC and the Catskill Mountains bordering the Mohawk on the East.  The Delaware were in the Delaware River Valley bordering the Mohawk on the South  The Susquehannock, west of the Delaware, bordered the Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga, and Seneca.  The Wenronhronon were south of and on Lake Erie west of the Seneca.  The Neutrals were north of Lake Erie and west of the Seneca.  (britannica.com map)  By forming the Federation (definitely by 1590) the Iroquois were not only able to keep the surrounding tribe from their territory, they gained the strength to expand their territory.

English Attempted Settlement of Virginia: 

In 1584 Sir Walter Raleigh obtained a patent from Queen Elizabeth for a settlement in North America and sent two vessels to scout a location and they landed on Roanoke Island (present day North Carolina) and named the country Virginia in honor of the virgin queen.  In 1585 600 men went to establish a colony to settle it and from which the English could control shipping lanes in the Americas and the adjacent Islands.  The expeditions larger vessels had to anchor outside of the sounds around the island and one of them was lost in a storm with many supplies.  108 men were left to build a temporary shelter and the expedition returned to England to return with supplies the following year.  Instead of planting food the men began to look for gold, using the natives they called Croatan’s (Croatan also the name of nearby present day Hatteras Island).

The English name Croatan’s might be the Secotan Tribe or the Chawanok or Weapemoc tribes, a tribe (or affiliate) of the Roanoke Indians, part of the Algonquian Tribes of the Carolinas.  Tension increased between the English and natives and when smallpox broke out in the tribes Chief Wingina of the Secotan changed his name to Pemisapan and tried to cut off all aid to the English.  His plan was to attack small bands of English when they went in search of food.  For this the English preemptively killed him.  Shortly after Sir Francis Drake’s fleet arrived and the decision for all to return to England was made abandoning the colony.

On the return to England two of the Secotan’s, Manteo and Towate, joined them on the voyage.  Additionally they carried back to England tobacco, maize (the Europeans called all grains such as wheat and oats corn and maize was referred to as Indian Corn), and potatoes.  They also carried word of a temperate climate and rich soils.  While initial attempts at settlement were looking to support expeditions to plunder gold and silver and support their conflicts with other European nations and increase their power, the information certainly had some thinking of colonization, to plant (and hence the word Plantation) like they had attempted in Ireland.

Shortly after they left Roanoke a supply ship with 400 men arrived and found the colony abandoned.  After interviewing some natives they learned it had returned to England with Drake.  The decision was made to also return to England but 15 men were left for an English presence and to protect Raleigh’s patent claims.  Raleigh decided to attempt another settlement but due to conflict with the Secotan he decided to move it to Chesapeake Bay.

In 1587 115 men, women, and children under the lead of John White, mostly middle class Londoners (looking to become landed gentry?), set off for America.  When they landed on Roanoke Island the fort and buildings were destroyed and the 15 men gone.  Bones of one man was found and presumed to be one of them killed by Indians.  Shortly after that one of the colonists was killed by an Indian.  Manteo had returned with them and a settler and he were sent to establish relations with the Croatan (Secotan).  The Croatan advised a larger federation of tribes inland had attacked the settlement and killed the 15 men.

The settlement decided to move 50 miles up Albermarle Sound.  White was to return to England and resupply for the settlers and return the next year.  Word of the impending Spanish Armada’s attack on England resulted in all ships being held in England.  Two smaller ships of White were allowed to leave with supplies but they were raided by French Pirates and the supplies taken.  Smith finally secured ships in 1590 and went to Roanoke Island and found “CRO” carved into a tree and “Croatan” on logs from which a palisades had been built.  Inside it appeared the buildings had been dismantled and chests belonging to Smith had been buried but subsequently dug up and ransacked.  They had agreed before his leaving that if they relocated the location would be carved into a tree and if they were under duress they would carve a cross.  Smith was certain they had relocated and Smith searched Croatan Island and the area around Roanoke but no one from the colony was found.

Several attempts to locate the colony over the next couple of decades revealed no clues and there are many lost colony theories.  The colonists were absorbed into local Indian populations either settling with them or captured as slaves.  Chief Powhattan had the Powhattan Tribe kill them but the lack of bones and evidence at the site disputes that.  England and Spain were at war and there was much activity in these remote areas and they may have attacked.  Disease was a possibility and would explain the lack of bodies as they would have been disposed of away from the healthy, most likely into the sea.  Other theories are cannibalism, witchcraft, and supernatural or religious explanations.  

Conclusion of the DNA diaspora in the Americas:

The DNA diaspora which came out of Africa split and one turned west ending in Great Britain and the other turned east, across Asia, Beringia, and into the Americas. Geography kept them apart for 10,000 plus years.  Europe advanced from a Clan (tribal) society, through a feudal society and for the most part were nation states.  In the Americas they were still mostly a tribal society, aside from the great empires in South America which compare to the feudal society of Europe.  Unfortunately for the inhabitants of the Americas geography kept them from the advancements which occurred in Europe, Asia and Africa most importantly horses and large pack animals, Iron and metal working, and gunpowder and the invention of firearms and cannons.  Thus they lacked the tools to compete with the Europeans in war.

In the world from the 1500s to the 1600s the Right of Conquest was the rule including in the tribes of the Americas.  Feudal states developed into nation states due to the threats from neighboring nation states.  The interactions between England, Scotland, and Ireland are good examples of this. Add to this fervent religious beliefs with little or no toleration for the beliefs of others.  For natives in America this meant the Europeans, who had little or no remorse for killing others of their kind for being the wrong religion or nationality, had little or no remorse over plundering and killing the natives, as the natives did among themselves.  It was a hard cruel world with much brutality.    

Word of the white man must have travelled to the interior of northeast and southeast North America.  Cartier’s contact in the St. Lawrence River would travel by word of mouth into the Great Lakes.  And Spanish incursions and De Soto’s expedition from Florida to the Mississippi would travel up the Mississippi River and the Ohio River.  And word of the Roanoke Settlement would travel across the eastern seaboard.  And there most likely were many contacts and interactions not recorded.  De Soto’s pillaging across the Southeast and the taking of Indians as slaves would have the tribes react cautiously with the whites and their power of metal weapons, tools, and armor would be both feared and desired to be possessed for their own uses.  We see some of the tribes using the power of the Europeans against their enemies, risking subservience to gain power.  

As word of the whites travelled so did the diseases they introduced into the Americas.   Contact with whites was more often than is indicated in written history.  An example is in the documentary “Curse of the Axe” which states that the tribe in contact with the fishermen who had temporary summer work sheds on the coast and traded with them is no longer there with no oral history of where they went.  And between them and the Algonquins was an Iroquois Tribe (unrelated to the Iroquois Federation) which is also gone.  Some estimates have the death toll from European diseases as high as 70-90% of the native population.  If hit with disease and weakened by decreasing numbers of warriors in the tribe it would most certainly be defeated and/or incorporated into neighboring tribes.

Tribes who had their numbers depleted by war with Europeans and by disease would look to their historic enemies as sources of slave labor and to build the strength of their tribe.  Women and children taken slave were most often incorporated into the tribe over time giving the tribe strength of numbers.  Conflict between enemies would cause larger alliances such as Powhattan of the Powhattan tribe in Virginia and the best example being the Iroquois Federation which controlled over 1/2 of present day New York State.  And so even though there was no permanent settlement outside of Florida, European contact had begun to change the interaction of the natives in North America between themselves.  The 1600s will only see more.

Scotland, Ireland and European Politics 1500-1600

1566 Map by French mapmaker Nicolas Desliens

We know from our DNA tests that John Hays who settled in VA and Patrick Hays (and brothers) who settled in PA had a common ancestor, that when arriving in America they were Presbyterian and came most likely from the tenant farmer class most likely from the Scottish lowlands, most likely southwest Scotland, then into Ulster before coming to America.  Even without specific dates and locations for the diaspora we can learn much of their reasoning for the moves by looking at history in general.

The DNA diaspora which paused in Scotland continues west to North America.

In 1500 Scotland and England were separate states each with their own king, but both with a waning feudal system moving towards a Nation State but with the Lords wielding much power.  Ireland was under the Clan System with the great Clan Chiefs taking turns at being in charge of all with England looking to control as the century progressed.  All were Roman Catholic, as was most of Europe at the start of the century but the reformation; Luther in Germany followed by Calvin and then his followers, saw protestants split from Roman Catholics and then Protestants further divide into various factions of Episcopal’s, Presbyters, and Congregationalists.  Spain was the major power with the largest navy at the start of the century but after Columbus discovered the new world all naval powers were looking for a passage to Asia.

The search for the northwest passage ended up in the discovery of the Americas.  Shortly thereafter attempts to establish settlements and control centered around the exploitation of the resources and natives.  Columbus exploited Hispaniola and Spain established a settlement in 1502 and fanned out from there; Jamaica 1509, Trinidad 1510, Florida in 1513, and conquered South America starting in 1519.  The French began with Cartier in present day Canada in 1534 and French Huguenots tried to settle in Florida in 1562 but no permanent settlement were made by 1600.  Sir Walter Raleigh in 1584 tried for England in Virginia but failed there. It would be in the 1600s before we see any settlements as Spains power decreased in relation to the other European powers.

After Columbus in 1497 we have John Cabot sailing for England landing in present Newfoundland claiming it for king. “The Curse of the Axe,” a documentary about an iron axe buried in a Wyandot village reveals that it is from the Basque region of Spain and it came to present day Canada with Spanish fishermen and whalers who set up summer camps on shore, evidence of early contact.  In 1507 Amerigo Vespucci sailing for Spain made several trips, accurate accounts are under dispute, and he wrote 2 books of his adventures which were widely read and spurred interest in the new world.  He claimed to sail the Guif of Mexico and the coast from Florida too Chesapeake Bay and it seems to be accepted at the time as maps made of his writings had the area named “America” in his honor. 

In 1513 Ponce de Leon landed in Florida and claimed it for Spain and in 1519 Hernan Cortez landed in Mexico and claiming it for Spain he then proceeded to then conquer the Aztecs. France got into the act with Giovanni Verrazzano in 1524 landing in present day NY and Narraganset Bay.  Also in 1524 Esteban Gomez for Spain sailed the eastern seaboard from Florida to Nova Scotia, failing to find a passage he took a large number of Indians prisoner to sell as slaves so he had something to show for his journey. Diego Ribero made a hand drawn map of America from Gomez trip, and in 1527 created the Padron Real Map of the world as it was then known. 

In 1534 French navigator Jacques Cartier was looking for the Northwest Passage when he discovered the Gulf of St. Lawrence and the St. Lawrence River.  He would return in 1535 and sail the St. Lawrence to the city of Hochelaga (present day Montreal, more under East America following).  Hernando de Soto landed in Florida near present day Tampa Bay with a large force and for the next 3 years explored and conquered the southeast of America, finally discovering the Mississippi River (more under Eastern America). 

St Augustine Florida was settled by Spain in 1565 to buffer a settlement by French Huguenots in Fort Caroline, present day Jacksonville.  And in 1584 Sir Walter Raleigh explored Roanoke, present day North Carolina and in 1585 returned to set up a colony (more on these in Eastern America).  Unlike future endeavors to settle and live and farm, these pre 1600 settlements were to buffer other countries advantages to trade and act as posts from which to privateer.  Spanish settlements were bases on which to exploit the locals and local resources.   

Early Spanish settlements in the Caribbean Isles and South and Central America had 2 objectives; convert to Catholicism and exploit the riches which could be plundered and sent back to Spain.  The Pizarro conquest of Peru and Cortez’ conquest of Mexico are two good examples of this.  As the century progressed, the reformation moving away from “Popish Rome” control then added another incentive for European powers to be at odds with each other for the reformed also included conversion to Protestantism, the penalty for non conversion to one or the other often being death.  English, French, and Dutch decisions in the Americas was to offset the Spanish Naval superiority.  Unfortunately for Spain, the loss of much of the Spanish Armada in 1588 to England was to tip the balance of power by 1600 from Spain controlling all of the Americas to French control of present day Canada and the Ohio and Mississippi River, Dutch control of present day NY, and English control of the Southeast and New England in the Northeast. 

Scotland and England

In 1502 King James IV and Henry VII entered into the Treaty of Perpetual Peace in an effort to end the continuous off and on conflicts between the two nations.  Under the treaty James IV is to marry Margaret Tudor, eldest daughter of Henry VII.  A son is born to them who will eventually become King James V of Scotland.  In 1507 King Henry VIII is crowned King of England.

In 1513 King Henry VIII declares war on France and invades them.  King James IV decides to support France and marches to Northumberland and meets an English army at Flodden on 9 September, 1513.  The English used both long bows and artillery against the Scots and then the two sides met in a medieval hand to hand combat battle which ended up with the Scots losing 10,000 men to the English 1200.  King James IV was killed.  Also William the 4th Earl of Errol and Lord High Constable died at the Kings side and John Hay, 2nd Lord Hay of Yester was killed in the battle and I expect many a Hay(s) of all social ranks died there, the feudal loyalty coming before country.

James V was an infant and various Regents and persons were vying for control and at 12 years of age he was crowned but in 1524 he was taken hostage by his stepfather and held for captive for 3 years but in 1528 he escaped and returned to power.  Due to raids north and south by both sides the border region had developed into a lawless area with reivers on both sides plundering.  In 1530 James imposed order on the bandit country as he solidified his control of Scotland. He married the French Kings daughter, Madeleine of Valous who died shortly thereafter.  He then married Mary of Guise, their only child to live was Mary (Queen of Scots), born 1542.

In 1542 James V dies and Mary is crowned Queen of Scots and Marie de guise becomes Queen regent with many others vying for control.  In 1544 King Henry VIII begins the “rough wooing,” cross border raids to entice an arranged marriage to his son Edward so Mary is brought to France for safe keeping as a result.  She is betrothed to Dauphin Francis, Son of King Henry II of France.  Henry VIII died in 1547 and his 9 year old son Edward came to the throne but he ruled only 9 years before dying.  Mary I (Mary Tudor, daughter of Henry VIII) rose to be Queen of England in 1553 but married Prince Phillip of Spain and returned the country to Catholicism.  After a short reign Mary I died in 1558 and Elizabeth I came to the throne in England.  She immediately reinstated the Church of England with her at the head.

In 1532 King Henry VIII separated from the Roman Catholic Church and formed an Episcopal (of Bishops) church with him at the head.  The lands and riches of the Catholic Church now were in Henry VIII possession.   John Knox was involved in the reformist movement and in 1546 got caught up in the take over of St. Andrews Castle by protestants in which a cardinal was killed.  A year later it was taken back at the request of regent Mary of Guise by the French.  Knox was imprisoned and banished to England in 1549 where he worked with the Church of England. When Mary I took over control of England he was forced to leave and went to Geneva to study.

Clan Hay divided on the religious issue but it has been written that many brothers chose opposing sides to save their lands and titles so the depth of belief versus political expediency is not known.  That said, many held deep religious beliefs for which they were willing to die for.  The northern Hay, the Earl of Errol remained Catholic and many in the southern lowlands reformed to Presbyterianism.  We find reference to the Hays signing the reformation oath, In An Old Kirk Chronicle Waddell writes of the Covenant in Tyninghame (East Lothian), Scotland; “Lauders and Cunninghames, Jacksons and Warts, Kers and Hays, for one day at least lifted above their common toil and out of their jealousies and strife, exalted with a new enthusiasm and bound together by the sacred pledge.” (An Old Kirk Chronicle being a history of Auldhame, Tyninghame, and Whitekirk in East Lothian” by Rev. P. Lately Waddell, B.D. 1818)   

In 1558 Mary married Francis, Dauphin of France and in 1559 he came to the throne of France but lived only one year.  Back in Scotland in 1556 John Knox found that the reformation had taken hold in Scotland with many of the nobility supporting it which kept the Queen regent at bay.  When summoned to Edinburg by the Bishops Knox had so many followers that his hearing was called off.  Knox returned to Geneva but in 1559 came back to Scotland.

Summoned to Edinburg by the Queen Regent, Knox and the protestants instead went to the walled city of Perth.  Preaching at St. John the Baptist Church Knox’s fiery sermon grew into a riot.  A mob attacked the friaries and looted gold and silver.  The Queen Regent offered to allow the protestants to leave the town and promised not to garrison it with French, but when garrisoned with those on the French payroll several nobles left her and joined the protestants.  Knox based himself at St. Andrews and protestant reinforcements were expected coming in against the expected French response.

Knox asked Elizabeth I for assistance as the uprising grew across all of lowland Scotland.  When French troops arrived in Leith the protestants retook Edinburg and in 1559 the Scottish nobility deposed Mary of Guise from the Regency.  Her secretary, William Maitland switched sides and took over government administration and English troops then arrived.  Mary of Guise died suddenly in 1560 which opened the door to an end of hostilities with both the French and English leaving Scotland.

The Scottish Parliament met to settle religious matters and they abolished the jurisdiction of the pope, condemned all doctrine and practice not of the reformed faith, and forbade the celebration of mass in Scotland.  The church, pronounced kirk in Scots, was to be organized by Knox who chose a Presbytery system along democratic lines.  Additionally, the system included plans for national education.  In 1561 Mary, Queen of Scots returned to her throne and 5 days later attended mass.  After a minor incident she issued a proclamation there would be no alteration on the current state of religion.  She met with Knox and a contentious relationship ensued over several meetings over several years.  With nobles support leaning towards Mary, Knox’s influence over political events waned.

In 1565 Mary married Henry Stuart, Lord Darnley, a fellow Catholic, and this caused many Protestant Lords to rebel but the rebellion fizzled out.  Lord Darnley demanded a Crown Matrimonial which would make him a co-sovereign of Scotland and sole ruler if he outlived Mary.  Mary denied it.  When she became pregnant the child was rumored to be her private secretary. Darnley, with a group of Protestant Lords murdered the secretary in front of the pregnant Mary. Darnley switched sides again and with Mary escaped to Edinburg.  In 1566 she gave birth to Charles James, the future James VI of Scotland.  

It was rumored that Mary was having an affair with the Duke of Bothwell.  In 1567 Mary prompted Darnell to return to Edinburg. He stayed at a house in the city walls to recuperate from an illness and Mary visited daily, indicating a reconciliation.  But in the early morning hours an explosion was heard and the house blown up and Darnley was found in the garden, apparently suffocated. Many suspects were reduced to Bothwell and he was charged but not convicted.  In 1567 Bothwell abducted Mary and they were married according to protestant rites, Bothwell having divorced his wife 12 days prior.  

26 Scottish nobles revolted and Mary and Bothwell formed an army to meet theirs.  Facing off, negotiations occurred as Mary’s army dwindled through desertion.  Bothwell was allowed to leave the field and the Lords took Mary to Edinburg where she was imprisoned.  She miscarried twins while imprisoned and was then forced to abdicate in favor of her son with James Stewart, 1st Earl of Moray as Regent.  In 1568 she escaped and raised an army but was defeated by Moray.  Mary escaped to England and her supporters and those of Moray kept battling for control.  Moray was assassinated and the next Regent, James paternal grandfather, was fatally wounded by Mary’s supporters. Several others follow and in 1579 James takes over himself.  

In 1582 at 16 James is taken prisoner but liberated in 1583 and takes increasing control of Scotland.  Kept under house arrest by Elizabeth I, Mary, Queen of Scots was eventually implicated in a plot against Elizabeth and beheaded in 1587.  James married Anne of Denmark in 1589 and proved himself a successful diplomat and administrator, keeping the Lords in line and happy.  In 1586 he signed the Treaty of Berwick setting himself up as successor to the childless queen of England.  

While written history marks the major political and religious events in the stories of the leaders, the population lives the history.  The continuous strife and conflict would leave the tenant farmer in precarious circumstances, barely able to survive, especially in the border region and western lowlands.  Indeed, on the borders the conflict was so bad that farming was almost completely abandoned because of the raids by border reivers. Religious beliefs ran so deep that people were willing to die for them.  Conversion for the farmer would usually follow the choice of the leaders.  In every battle or conflict the tenant farmer would be called to duty such as at Flodden were we see 23 leaders falling, certainly hundreds of Hay’s also met their demise.

Ireland and England

In 1500 Ireland was under a Clan system and Catholic.  England Was trying to assert control over the country by controlling the Clan Chiefs.  Under these chief’s were lesser and sub chief’s who controlled smaller Clans and Septs, mostly Anglo Norman and Hiberno Norman Barons.   In 1534 the Lord Deputy General of Ireland was the 9th Earl of Kildare and he was called to London under charges of disloyalty leaving his son, Thomas Fitzgerald, in charge.  When rumors reached Thomas Fitzgerald that his father had been killed, Fitzgerald renounced allegiance to Henry VIII and swore allegiance to papal authority and he seized Dublin.

Henry’s new Lord Deputy, Sir William Skeffington, retook Dublin and then stormed Fitzgeralds stronghold.  Lacking aid from Scotland or Spain Fitzgerald surrendered.  Over the next year and a half the rebellion was put down and Fitzgerald and 5 uncles were hanged.  Henry VIII solidified his control over the country and in 1541 declared himself King of Ireland reinforced by the Irish Parliament voting in a statute proclaiming him so.

When Elizabeth I came to power she was the Supreme Governor of the Church of Ireland, the Irish Episcopal counterpart to the Church of England.  Papal authority was denied and Catholic Bishops and Priests were persecuted.   She also placed English men in charge of affairs in an effort to control the Lords and Barons.  This led to the Desmond Rebellion in 1569 and the rebellion continued to the Munster Rebellion in 1583 when the rebellion was finally put down with Desmond killed and his 300,000 acres of land escheated.  To further Anglicization of Ireland the lands  were to be broken up into portions up to 12,000 acres and English families would be settled, or “planted” on it.  By 1598 4000 English people had been planted, the first plantation system.   

Hugh O’Neill was orphaned when his father, Fear Dorcha O’Neill, Earl of Tyrone was murdered.  He was raised as an English Gentleman.  He attended court in London and the Irish Parliament and in the Munster Rebellion fought with the English.  In 1587 Hugh O’Neill was given the Title of Earl of Tyrone and so like his father before him carried claim to the O’Neill Gaelic title from the north of Ireland and also the English title of Earl.  He gained control of the O’Neill title in 1592 and with it control of all the O’Neill lands.  In taking the title he had made himself into a ruthless and powerful warlord.  Within his domain the peasantry were treated as serfs and he used their labor to generate cash flow which was then invested in muskets, ammunition, and pikes to arm his military.  

Elizabeth was placing English Sheriff’s throughout Ireland.  She was to grant the freemen, the tenant farmers, property rights to their land and the rent paid to the agents of the queen, thus removing the political and legal control of the Irish Lords.  For O’Neill this meant that he could not muster and maintain his army.  O’Neill was in contact with the King of Spain who was providing money, arms, and military advisors to him.  This while he maneuvered to get himself named Lord President of Ulster.  When he wasn’t so named he openly joined the rebellion against England.

O’Neill’s rebellion slowly turned into a self declared holy war for Irish independence.  The English attacked Ulster and were repelled. The victory caused the rebellion to spread across all of Ireland.  Open rebellion in Munster with the aid of O’Neill’s forces resulted in the Munster Plantation being completely destroyed.  Native Lords who remained loyal to England saw their people side with the rebels.  England, saddled with a war in the Spanish Netherlands was stretched thin.

The Earl of Essex arrived in Ireland with 17,000 troops but he had nothing but disastrous expeditions and ended up signing a humiliating truce with Hugh O’Neill.  Walled up in defensive quarters, disease brought death and a reduction in Essex forces.  He challenged O’Neill to a single combat to settle the war but O’Neill didn’t respond.  The tide began to turn in the South when Munster was retaken.  In the North the English employed a scorched earth policy figuring to deny the rebels food and reinforcements.  And so as they went about they killed, burned, and destroyed all they came across sparing neither woman or child.    

In 1601 the Spanish finally arrived with 3000 troops in Kinsale in the South.  English Commander Mountjoy with 7000 went to meet them.  O’Neill marched from the North to sandwich the English between two forces. Irish foot soldiers were met by English cavalry and routed and several hundred killed.  The Spanish and Irish withdrew and the Spanish surrendered under terms, being allowed to return to Spain.  The Irish then began to withdraw north to defend Ulster.  The question now was what terms the Irish could get in their losing battle.

O’Neill was reduced to guerrilla tactics as the English armies now swept across Ireland burning and killing as they went.  The destruction caused famine so deep that the locals resorted to cannibalism.  O’Neill’s sub Lords began to surrender under terms and by 1603 O’Neill himself surrendered under terms to Mountjoy.  O’Neill and the other lords received full pardons and abandon their Irish titles but keep the English ones.  In 1604 Mountjoy pardoned all rebels.  The war left England bankrupt.  In addition, English and Welsh men conscripted to fight the war suffered 30,000 dead.  O’Neill reported 70,000 dead in action.  Over the countryside 100,000 died from war, disease, and starvation which was 10% of the population of Ireland then.  The land lay waste, Ulster was totally destroyed.   

European powers and rulers in 1600

In 1603 Queen Elizabeth died and James the VI of Scotland was crowned James I of England thus he controlled England, Scotland, and Ireland.  

The Netherlands in 1500 were ruled by the Catholic Habsburgs from Spain and control eventually given to Philip II.  Over time the country became more Protestant with the reformation and in 1566 mobs rioted and smashed churches and Philip II sent an army to restore order but instead it formed a police state.  A popular uprising begins and William the Orange takes control of the uprising and war with Spain starts.  William of Orange was assassinated in 1584 and the crown offered to Henry III of France and Elizabeth I of England but both decline but do send military assistance.   

The provinces in the north were Calvanist and supported religious toleration.  Those in the south were Catholic and supported reconciliation with Spain.  In 1588 the seven northern provinces set themselves up as a republic with each province independent appointing their own stadholder and having one vote in a states general which needs to vote unanimously.  The Stadholder in Holland and Zeeland is the son of William of Orange, Maurice of Nassau and he is appointed stadholder in 3 more provinces giving his a lot of control.  He forms an army and navy and pushes Spain south.   

In 1596 both France and England recognize the new republic but it won’t be until the end of the 30 years war and and peace with Spain that Netherlands is formally divided from the south Spanish Netherlands, today known as Belgium.  The Stadholder in 1600 was Frederick Henry of the House of Orange.  

France in the 1500’s was at war with Italy in the early part of the century and also impacted by the reformation starting mid century.  French Protestants, called Huguenots, were brutally suppressed and France was in a state of civil war from 1562 to 1598 over religion until the Edict of Nantes supported religious toleration.  The King of France was Henry IV of the House of Bourbon as we start the 1600s.  

Spain in the 1500’s was building the first global empire and one of the largest in world history.    Isabella I and Ferdinand II authorized the Columbus expedition in 1492.  In 1516 Charles I, Holy Emperor was the King of Spain and the Holy Roman Emperor.  In addition to vast European holdings, Spain conquered the empires of Mexico and South America and also the Philippine Islands among other locations.  In 1556 he abdicated and Philip II became King of Spain (Rome went to his brother Ferdinand).  Philip II married Mary I of England but her death prevented any control of that nation by him.  War with the Netherlands and England in the latter half of the century drained his treasury and the Spanish Armada incident in 1588 weakened his navy.  The plague hit Spain at the end of the century and Philip II died in 1598.  The King of Spain in 1600 was Philip III of the House of Habsburg.  

The decisions of these Monarch’s and their governments and their successors would greatly impact my Hays ancestors movement from Scotland to Ireland in the 1600s and to North America in the 1700s. 

Eastern American Geography Guiding the Settlement of the Hays’ in America

A map of the 18 major river basins in the lower 48 states created by Imgur user Fejetlenfej , a geographer and GIS analyst. https://imgur.com/gallery/WaEbi

To understand why people, first the natives then the Europeans, moved and settled where they did in Eastern America we need to understand a little bit about the geography of America from the Mississippis River Basin and east of the Mississippi River, especially the mountains and rivers which directed them.

The Appalachian Mountain Range is a series of Mountain Ranges, Plateaus, and Ridges which extends about 2000 miles southwest from Brunswick in Canada to East Tennessee and Northern Alabama.  It is divided into 3 Regions; North (Newfoundland to The Berkshires in MA and CT), Central (Hudson River Valley to New River [Tributary to Great Kanawha] in NC, VA, WV), and Southern (Blue Ridge Mountains and Cumberland Plateau) and provided a geographical divide  between the eastern seaboard and the midwest region.  The Adirondack Mountains are distinct from the Catskill Mountains and are not part of the Appalachian Range although their position impacts the diaspora.  

From: https://www.chegg.com/flashcards/us-capitals-states-and-physical-features-62553e73-bdc9-42dd-82a2-c283e4401605/deck

The Pleistocene Age ended about 11,700 years ago with the end of the last ice age.  The ice had covered almost all of Canada and parts of the Northern U.S.  The end of the ice age opened up present day Great Britain to settlement by humans and at the same time closed off the Americas from further migration of people by foot across Beringea and it formed the present oceans.  In North America it resulted in the Great Lakes and the course of the Ohio River.  It scoured out the Finger Lakes in NY and others in many states and determined the courses of the river systems.

The rivers and lakes were the roads of the undeveloped country and the natives had established many trails and portages which connected them.  When the Europeans first arrived by ocean it was first into the bay and then up the larger Rivers, tidal straights actually, that the Europeans sailed.  When Europeans first settled it was first along the bays, then the rivers, and finally they used the established trails as they moved inland.  As north America had no large pack animal prior to European introduction of the horse, movement of goods was by water or foot with larger waterbodies allowing movement of larger qualities of goods.  When the French, Dutch, English, and Spanish vied for control of eastern North America it was along the same paths that the natives used to wage tribal wars against one another or to trade or access hunting lands and fishing areas.

The Great Lakes (Superior, Michigan, Huron, Erie, and Ontario) are a series of interconnected fresh water lakes  which comprise about 84% of North Americas fresh water.  Stretching from Ontario, Canada and Minnesota in the U.S. to Quebec, Canada and New York in the U.S they then connect to the Atlantic Ocean via the St. Lawrence River from lake Ontario flowing northeast into the Gulf of St. Lawrence in New Brunswick Canada. Tributaries feeding into this form the Great Lakes Basin.

From http://extension.msstate.edu/sites/default/files/publication-images/P3082/Figure_1.jpg, Mississippi State University Extension

The Atlantic Seaboard Basin consists of river watersheds; Susquehanna, Hudson, Savannah, Delaware, Yadkin, and Potomac among other smaller ones.  The Susquehanna Basin starts at Otsego Lake which feeds the North Branch of the Susquehanna in NY flowing southwest and the West Branch in PA flowing east, then south and southeast through PA to MD where it empties into the Chesapeake Bay.

From https://www.weather.gov/, National Weather Service

The Delaware Basin starts on the west side of the Catskill Mountains at the East Branch in Delaware County, NY and the West Branch in Schoharie County, NY flowing southeast and combined flowing south traveling through NJ, PA (Philadelphia) and DE. 

From https://www.weather.gov/, National Weather Service

The Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin has headwaters at the Appalachian ridge in in VA and the main branch in NC flowing east and then south through NC and SC entering the Winyuh Bay and then the Atlantic.  The Savanah Basin is the Tugalo and Chatooga Rivers which form to make the Savannah River.  It flows southeast and is much of the border between SC and GA draining into the Atlantic Ocean.  

The Potomac Basin starts on the North Branch in MD (a small part in WV) flowing east and the South Branch flowing northeast with headwaters in VA and the River mostly in WV, when the branches combine they flow southeast into the Chesapeake Bay in MD, DC and VA. The Shenandoah River originates on 2 forks in WV and VA combining and running northeast and it is a tributary of the Potomac at Harpers Ferry, WV. 

From https://www.weather.gov/, National Weather Service

The Hudson River Basin starts in the Adirondack Mountains and flows south then east then south again.  It is met just north of Troy, NY by the Mohawk River.  The Schoharie Creek originates in the Catskill Mountains and flows north to feed the Mohawk River.  The Mohawk River originates on the west side of the Adirondack Mountains and flows east-southeast to the Hudson River.   At Troy NY the Hudson River becomes a tidal estuary flowing south to Manhattan.

Reproduced from a post on Reddit.com, unknown original source.

The Gulf of Mexico Basin is fed by the Rio Grande and Mississippi River Watershed.  The Mississippi River watershed extends from the Rocky Mountains in the West to the Great Lakes Basin and all the area west of the Appalachian Mountains.  It includes the Ohio River on its eastern side and the Missouri River on the west.  The Ohio River starts at the confluence of the Allegheny and Monongahela Rivers in Pittsburg and flows west-southwest to the Mississippi River.  The Ohio River is fed by the Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers near the confluence of the Mississippi River.  The Mississippi Basin covers 32 U.S. states and 2 Canadian provinces encompassing over 1.1 million square miles traveling from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico in New Orleans.

The Hays from Ulster entered PA by the Delaware Bay in PA, most likely Philadelphia.  From there they settled in Derry PA.  Migration continued down the Shenandoah River Valley to Roanoke, VA.  Migrations of the Hays’ from there continued along the valley but was stopped by the Appalachian Ridge and the control of the land by natives.  Here the migration turned into the Yadkin River Valley until such time as land began to open in TN.  The Watauga settlement was started as exploration through the Cumberland Gap as did explorations of TN and KY and Hays’ would settle in both East TN, middle TN, and KY before migrating further west from there.  There were Hays’ at the Cumberland Settlement, the first settlement of Nashville.  My Hays line went from Augusta, VA to Greene, TN (near the Watauga Settlement and Knoxville).  There was a Hays, a son in law, with Daniel Boone when he explored and settled KY.  

New York State was a central point in the navigation of the east.  The Hudson River was tidal to North of Albany and thus navigable by larger ships and could be followed further north, then overland to Lake George north to portage to Lake Champlain and again on foot to access the St. Lawrence River and present day Quebec and Montreal.  To travel west from Albany one would overland to bypass the Cohoes Falls to present day Schenectady and access the Mohawk River which provided access west of the Appalachian Range. A short portage to to Oneida Lake, Oneida River and the Oswego River brings one to Lake Ontario and access to inland America on the lakes.

From https://geology.com/state-map/maps/new-york-rivers-map.gif

The Schoharie Creek is a tributary to the Mohawk River with headwaters in the Catskill Mountains flowing north.   This provides access to the Delaware River headwaters as both waters are in Schoharie County in NY.  Or one could travel further west to the headwaters of the Susquehanna River.  Inversely, from Chesapeake Bay or Delaware Bay one could follow that river to the Schoharie Creek, the Mohawk River, and the Oneida Lake route to the Great Lakes.

The Ohio River with headwaters in western PA, and a short distance from Lake Erie, flows through the eastern U.S. meeting the Mississippi River North of TN.  The Cumberland River flows from KY into middle TN (Nashville) turning northwest into KY to meet the Ohio River upstream of the confluence with the Mississippi River.  The Tennessee River flows through Eastern TN (Knoxville) southwest into northern Alabama then northeast back into western TN then KY meeting the Ohio River in between the Cumberland River and the Mississippi River.  The Watauga River is a tributary to the South Holiston River and the Tennessee River entering near Knoxville. All these rivers are relevant as we look at the Hays diaspora across America.

from https://www.tennesseeriverkeeper.org/rivermaps

Note: All maps are posted for non commercial educational purposes under the Fair Use Doctrine and may not be reproduced from this site for other than fair use without the permission of the original copywrite holders. Source link provided in captions.

A Patrick Hays Tree by Mary Sheffield Wolz

This web site is starting to show up on searches for Patrick Hays and one of the interesting parts of doing the site is the extended cousins that I get to correspond with. Mary’s brother had found the site and emailed me and when I asked about their tree he forwarded these Family Group sheets with notes which I post, graciously provided by Mary Sheffield Wolz. The line is Patrick 1705-1790, Samuel 1728-1805, James 1758-1830, Samuel 1786-1874, James S. 1822-1860, Samuel E. 1855-1933, James T. 1879-1965 (Mary’s grandfather). Thanks to Mary for sharing and hopefully helping out a fellow Hays relative in their search for their roots.

Patrick Hays 1705-1790

Samuel Hays b. 1728 Dauphin, PA d. 1805 Bowling Green, KY. m. Elizabeth Priscilla Bradford b. Augusta, VA d 1810 Bowling Green, KY. Family Group chart missing in email.

James Hays 1758-1830
Samuel Hays 1786-1874
James Samuel Hays 1822-1860
Samuel Elgin Hays
James Thomas Hays 1879-1965

Cousins updates (2) and an unrelated to (Patrick Hays-PA but with Hays ancestors) contact

1. Hey Bro, we’re cousins.

A close family friend (so close we call each other Brother) contacted me with the news that we are cousins (by marriage).  It turns out his wife was doing genealogical research and was reviewing 5th to 8th cousins on Ancestry.com when she came across my photo (Ancestry offers autosomal DNA and matches members with their possible cousins).  We shared a 4th Great Grandfather on my fathers maternal line, Joseph Price 1769-1834.  I’m sure I’ll be introduced as “BroCus” at any gatherings as an opening to discussing genealogy research in the family.  It’s a small world after all.

This got me to thinking about how American was I?  So I went back to my own family tree using the maternal name that married into my Hays line following their paternal lines.  Peoples trees on Ancestry trace my Grandmothers Price line back to Daniel Price born 1725 in Henrico, VA. Price is a welsh name and is the 91st most common name (out of 100) in the US (2020).  Great Grandmother Mary Ellen Wilcox married Alexander Hays in TX and her line traces back to George Wilcox born 1718 in VA.  Wilcox is Scottish or English in origin, from medieval English.  By the time America was settled most surnames had been Anglicised (even Irish and Scottish Gaelic names). 

My 2nd Great Grandmother Harriet Atwood Walker married William A. Hays in Greene, TN and her line traces back to Thomas Walker born 1650 in Westmoreland, VA. Walker, like Wilcox is the Anglicised form from Scotland or England. 3rd Great Grandmother Sarah W. Rodgers (b. 1808) married George Hays in Greene, TN and her line goes back to one generation to Robert Rodgers with no information available.  Rodgers is also Anglicised English or Scottish, this spelling variation more common in Scotland.  4th Great Grandmother Abigail Cravens married William Hays in either Rockbridge, VA or Greene, TN. It traces back to Robert Cravens born 1733 in Lewes, Sussex Co., DE.  Cravens is of English origin.  From William A. Hays back my Hays line were Presbyterian and appear to be active in church so it is safe to assume the spouses were also Presbyterian and most likely their families Presbyterian migrants from Ulster, Scotland, or England settling in proximity to my hays line (eventually).

You can follow our diaspora of Hays pioneers as Ancestry has an interactive map based on the census which shows in 1840 NY, PA, OH, and TN led the country with between 114-226 Hays family names with OH 1st which had 226 Hays’ which was 14% of us in the US. The name shows in all the settled areas of the U.S. that time.  By 1920 PA, OH, IN, IL, MO, KY, TN, GA, AL, MS, AR, OK, and TX all had between 301-600 Hays families but every state in the U.S. had Hays families in it.  There were 600 Hays families in #1 KY, 7% of all the recorded Hays in the country.  States around this cluster and CA, OR, and WA came in second 101-300, the midwest and New England coming in last at 1-100.  The 2010 census has “Hays” name ranked at 1021 with 34,191 records (Smith, Johnson, Williams, Jones, and Brown are the top 5) and out of each 100,000 people we are 11.59% of the population. Hayes is in 127th place and Hay ranks 2005 and it is unknown how many of these are Ulster Scot Presbyterian with a changed spelling (See Hays spellings).  

Fair use from Ancestry.com, Hays diaspora 1840 in the U.S.A.

It was my father who broke the line of Hays men marrying women with pre-Revolutionary War Colonial roots.  But this was understandable as it was his generation which finalized the Hays’ generational moves west when he landed in CA with the other “Oakies” in the 1930’s.  Like many other Hays’ he ran out of land to continue migrating west.  (although service in the Pacific theatre in WWII, Korea [war and after], and Vietnam leave the possibility the DNA continued to migrate west?). Military service brought him back east to NY where he married my mother, a 3rd generation German immigrant to this state on her paternal line, 2nd on her maternal her mother arriving as a baby, settling in VT and upstate NY.  Some of his children and grand children stayed in NY and as is the custom in America now some moved about the country following adventure, a spouse, or work. 

Note on name as ancestry alone. The 2010 census shows about 70% of U.S.A. “Hayes” identifying as White – non hispanic, 85% of Hay, and 91% of Hays ruling out many as immigrants from Scotland to Ulster to America excepting acknowledged intermarriage. Also the spelling of Hays was historically phonetic, especially in those who could not write (pre-Presbyterian education in the peasant class in Great Britain prior to 1600 and in rural America west of the Mississippi – both my Grandfather and Great Grandfather for example) and so they made their mark and another spelled based upon how it sounded. proper genealogy research requires name matching (including similar spelling), DNA, religion, and other historical records matching. Don’t cheap out, do the research.

2. Chickasaw Nation

RS contacted me after finding the AmericanMan web site.  His mother was a Hays and he traced her line back to Patrick Hays in PA and he’s actually been to the gravesite in Derry, PA (on my bucket list).  He’s a citizen of the Chickasaw Nation (fathers side) and also a member of the Love County Historical Society and so I got a lot of information on Burneyville, Love, OK. which is where my Great Grandfather, Robert Alexander Hays migrated to with his wife Mary. Robert Alexander is buried in the Burneyville Cemetery.  I have no information on why they migrated to Chickasaw Territory to farm. The 1900 census shows Township 7, Chickasaw Nation, Indian Territory with Mary as the head of household with 8 children, widowed the year prior. I addressed the question of Indian ancestry but will need to do site investigations to see why the couple, he from Green, TN and she from Equality, Miller, MO. and who were married in TX, settled in OK. 

The 1910 census shows Mary as head of household with my Grandfather, Thomas Jefferson Hays 18, and 3 younger sisters in Hickory, Love, OK. By 1920 my Grandfather was listed as head of household, married with a one year old child and Mary and his sister, Lula R. 24 residing in Justice Precinct 5 Cooke, TX. Thomas J. had children born in order; Illinois Bend, Montague, TX; Plainview , Hale, TX, Illinois Bend, Montague, TX; Plainview, Hale, TX; and Cyril, OK, the last being my father who was a baby when his father died.   The 1930 census shows my fathers family in Olton, Lamb, TX and in 1940 he was in Plainview, TX again but some time in between he lived with his uncle Jess Price in Chandler, Commanche, OK.  

RS advised that the Burneyville Cemetery is quite large but Burneyville itself is almost a ghost town.  The Love County Historical Society is in the Pioneer Museum in Marietta, OK (Love County seat).  It’s run by volunteers so hopefully it’s still open when the lockdowns are lifted as I would greatly like to visit it and do research.  His parents met in TX so the connection of Hays to Burneyville was of interest to him.  I’ll check and see if he has his Hays family tree and if he’ll share it and approves its posting on this site.

Calgary, Canada

MT in Calgary, Canada contacted me after reviewing AmericanMan.org.  He’s an R1a (our Hays are R1B) but he has many Hays in his lineage and was wondering if I came across any R1a Hays’ in my searches for the name which I haven’t.  R1 split into R1a and R1b around the last ice age.  My Hays line is R1b1a2 with the R-M269 marker which is the most common marker from Europe and dominated in the Yamnaya Culture 3500 BCE.  It also includes R-M343 which migrated from Kazakstan across Unkraine, Romania, the Italian Alps and into France. The R1 (R-M420) migrated from Kazakstan into Russia and then Belarus.  The Hay and Hayes DNA Projects reveals not only R1’s with a Hay derived name but many others, although the bulk of Hays’, over 75% of the 275 in the Hay project, appear to be R1b and most of them with the R-M269 marker. 

Note: We concurred that the education of people in North America is greatly lacking. Not only are American’s taught virtually NOTHING about Canadian History and Canadians taught virtually NOTHING about U.S History, neither country properly teaches their own history which we discovered in our genealogy research. I’ll add to this the history of Mexico and the U.S. I suggest everyone get on internetrchive.com and download history books, now public domain and many digitalized or available for a digitalized free borrow from a library from written in the time you are researching or shortly thereafter. And remember to send them a tax deductible donation as they are in INVALUABLE resource to truth and history.

Cousin news – a family tree from a direct descendant of Patrick Hays (PA)

I received an email from cousin JBH (1024th, 10 generations removed) and subsequently he sent me a copy of his tree going back to Patrick Hays of Derry, Dauphin County PA.   Both he and I have had the Big-Y test done at Family Tree DNA and at 10 generations have about an 80% chance of a common ancestor which I believe to be the father (?1) or grandfather (?0) of Patrick Hays of Derry, PA which is a direct ancestor of JBH.  While not in my direct line I copy 5 generations of it below as he has written it as it may contain information useful to another.  My comments are in italics, underlined numbers refer to that persons number in bold when listed as a parent. The number in the name is the generation removed from Patrick Hays (PA). I left off generations 6 to 8 assuming that information is readily available but you can email me with any questions you have on them and I’ll get back to you.

Generation No. 1

1. ? HAYS – (In Ulster for unknown number of generations, originally from Scotland, most likely the lowlands in the southwest of the country).

Generation No. 2

Children of ? Hays

2. i. PATRICK HAYS B. 1705 Donegal, Ireland d. January 31, 1790 Derry Two., Dauphin Co. PA

ii. HUGH HAYS

iii. WILLIAM HAYS

iv. JAMES HAYS

(This is consistent with the Biographical Encyclopedia of dauphin County, PA)

2.  PATRICK HAYS 2 (?1) was born 1705 in Donegal Ireland, and died January 31, 1790 in Derry Two., Dauphin Co., PA.  He married JEAN MCKNIGHT, daughter of Alexander McKnight and Jean.

Notes-Patrick was thought to have come from Ireland in 1728 with his brothers (Consistent with the Biographical Encyclopedia) , although their names are quoted differently in a few sources.  Most say Hugh, James, and William.  Others change James with David. It has been postulated they came from Fannet Parish, Donegal County, Ireland (a Presbyterian parish located near Derry (Londonderry). He was known to own land on on the Beverly Manor in Augusta Co., VA which he deeded to sons William and Samuel in May 1750.  He is buried in Old Derry Graveyard (now Hershey, PA).  On 10 Jan 1737 he was warrantee to 300 acres and owned 600 acres in Derry Township, PA.  Also of note a Patrick Hays was known to own land in Lincoln Co., KY in the 1780’s.  On 28 Sep 1786 a James, Hugh (son of Patrick Sr.?) and Patrick sign a petition to make Logan’s Station a town (Stanford), KY.

Augusta County Deed Book #23-page 123 – 19th Oct 1779. Patrick Hays, brother of Hugh Hays, deceased, late of Lancaster Co., PA to James Buchanan, all his interest in estate of Hugh, deceased, in PA, or his daughter Margaret (deceased?).

Augusta County Deed Book #23-Page 124- 19th Oct 1779. Hugh Hays, of Augusta, son of Patrick Hays and nephew of Hugh Hays, late of Lancaster Co., PA deceased to James Buchanan. Similar as above.

(These two deed entries somehow link the Augusta/Rockbridge Co. VA Hayses (ie John Coffee Hays) to Patrick of PA.  (for my discussion on the relations of Patrick (PA), John (VA), and Patrick (VA) click on this link)

Jean McKnight’s father came to Lancaster County by 1722, landed at New Castle, Delaware from Scotland.  An Elder in Donegal Presbytery in 1734.  Buried with wife in Old Donegal Churchyard.

Children of Patrick Hays and Jean McKnight are:

i. ELEANOR 3 HAYS b 1735, Dauphin Co., PA; d. Big Springs, Cumberland Co., PA m. PATRICK CAMPBELL,  February 06, 1755, Old Paxton Church.

ii. JEAN HAYS b. 1739 Dauphin Co., PA m. WILLIAM SCOTT, October 31, 1765, Old Paxton Church.

iii. PATRICK HAYS b. 1734 Dauphin County, PA; d. 1812 Lycoming Co., PA; m. NANCY MCCALISTER, 1763.

3. iv. SAMUEL HAYS, SR.. b. 1741, Dauphin Co., PA; d. 1805 Bowling Green, KY.

4. v. DAVID HAYS b February 2, 1733 Dauphin Co., PA; d. July 26, 1809, Middle SPrings, Franklin Co., PA.

5. vi. ROBERT HAYS, B. February 02, 1733, Dauphin Co., PA; d. June 06, 1809 Cumberland Co., PA.

6. vii. WILLIAM HAYS, b 1742, Dauphin Co., PA; d. August 26, 1804 near Mercersburg, Franklin Co., PA.

Generation No. 3

3. SAMUEL 3 HAYS, SR. (PATRICK 2, ?1) was born 1741 in Dauphin Co., PA and died 1805 in Bowling Green, KY. He married ELIZABETH BRADFORD.

Notes-Samuel Hays (1734-1805) was born in Dauphin County, Pennsylvania to Patrick Hays and Jean McKnight.  He married Elizabeth Bradford before 1765 in Augusta County, Virginia, and they late moved to Warren County, Kentucky. Ancestry, descendants and relatives lived in Pennsylvania, Virginia, Kentucky, Illinois, Missouri, Texas, and elsewhere.

JSH advised by email and I post here for review: I have always rejected the notion that Elizabeth Bradford is the wife of OUR Samuel Hays. Re; Elizabeth Braford/Bradford w/o Samuel Hays.  From the Chalkley’s Chronicles, Vol. III, p.183-4: 12-17-1787 Samuel Braford’s will – Wife; Ann. Daughters; Mary Braford (unmarried), Ann, Rachel and Elizabeth. Sons: John, James, Hugh and Samuel. Grandson; Samuel Hays, son of dau. Elizabeth, infant. If he should die an infant then legacy goes to sister Elizabeth Christian. Executor: Patrick Christian, son-in-law of Augusta Co. & Samuel Miller, son-in-law of Rockingham Co. Teste: Wm. Shields, Samuel Hunter, Peter Frazer Proved: 21 April 1789 Administration: John & James Bransford. Chalkley’s Chronicles, Vol. III, p.186: 4-28-1790 Samuel Brauford’s estate appraised by John Sterling, James Shields and Samuel Hays.

JSH Note: By 1780 Samuel & Elizabeth Hays were well established in Rutherford Co., NC. According to William Hays’ statement in his pension application his family moved to Rutherford Co., NC after their house burned in Augusta Co., VA while he was still a boy. It is doubtful that if Samuel Hays had married Elizabeth Bradford and moved to Rutherford Co., NC that he would have been appraising the estate of his father-in-law in Virginia some 10 years later. To be an appraiser of an estate you must be a resident of that county in which the estate lies. The will also infers that Elizabeth (Bradford) Hays has only one child, Samuel, by an unknown Hays and is now married to Patrick Christian by whom she has one daughter, Elizabeth. The Samuel Hays listed as an appraiser is probably a brother of her now deceased husband. In fact, I feel this proves that our Elizabeth is not the daughter of Samuel Bradford. What do you think?

Recorded information from Joseph Hays: This narrative begins with Samuel Hays, son of Patrick Hays and Jean McKnight Hays, a Scottish-Irish pioneer, of the Shenandoah Valley region. Little is know about Samuel except that he married Elizabeth Bradford and raised his family in Augusta County, Virginia.

From the Augusta records we find a Samuel Hays in 1753 with 100 acres on the James River in the Borden Tract.  In 1763, Samuel and his wife Elizabeth sold this land to William Thompson and moved onto 215 acres in the Beverly Manor that belonged to his father Patrick Hays of Derry Two., Lancaster County, Pennsylvania.  In 1769 Patrick deeded this land to Samuel and the remaining 259 acres of a 474 acre patent to Samuels brother William Hays (Chalkley, Vol. 3, pages 316, 368, 416, 488).

It is known that Samuel by 1779 had moved to Rutherford County, North Carolina, after their homestead burned in Virginia. Samuel remained here until 1798 when he and his family moved to Warren County, Kentucky.  Only three of his children are known: James, William, Samuel, Jr.

Samuel Hays, Sr., died in 1805 by witness the proven will of his in the Warren County Courthouse.  He is thought to be buried in the graveyard on his son’s Williams place now on the North side on the Barren River at Ben Thompson Ford (Hays Ford).

September 18, 1763-Samuel Hays and Elizabeth to William Thompson 45, 100 acres in a line of Borden’s great tract near the land of John Edminston. Augusta County, Virginia,  Deed Book, Page 407.

Children of Samuel and Elizabeth Bradford are

7. i. JAMES 4 HAYS, b. 1758 Augusta, VA; d 1830 Montgomery Co., Missouri.

ii SAMUEL HAYS, JR., b. unknown; m. Violet Gillion, 1801

8. iii. WILLIAM HAYS, SR., b. March 10, 1761 Augusta, VA; d. September 25, 1851 Warren Co., KY.

4. DAVID 3 HAYS (Patrick 2, ?1) was born in 1731 in Dauphin Co., PA, and died July 26, 1809 in Middle Springs, Franklin Co., PA He married MARTHA WILSON.

Children of David Hays and Martha Wilson are:

i WILSON 4 HAYS m. MARY CULBERTSON.

ii. PATRICK HAYS, m. ELIZABETH GALBRAITH.

iii. ROBERT HAYS m. MARY MCCUNE.

iv. MARY HAYS, m. STEPHEN CULBERTSON.

v. JANE HAYS, m. HUGH HAMILTO, March 15, 1804.

vi. DAVID HAYS.

vii. JAMES HAYS

viii. THOMAS HAYS.

5. ROBERT 3 HAYS (Patrick 2, ? 1) was born February 02, 1733 in Dauphin County, PA, and died June 06, 1809 in Cumberland County., PA.  He married MARGARET WRAY March 25, 1762 in Old Paxton Church. 

Notes-He was a Ranger in the French and Indian Wars and a Lt. in the Revolutionary War.

Children of Robert Hays and Margaret Wray are:

i. JEAN 4 HAYS, b. 1763 Dauphin Co., PA; d. 1817.

ii. JOHN HAYS, b. 1765 m. Margaret Gray.

9. iii. PATRICK HAYS, b. 1767 Dauphin Co., PA; d. July 28, 1857 Oakville, Cumberland Co., PA.

iv. MARGARET HAYS, b 1769 Dauphin Co., PA.

v. ROBERT HAYS, b. 1771 Dauphin Co., PA. m JEAN HAYS.

vi. DAVID HAYS, b. 1773, Dauphin Co., PA; d. October 08, 1796.

vii. SAMUEL HAYS, b. 1775.

viii. JAMES HAYS, b. 1777 Dauphin Co., PA; d. 1778 Dauphin Co., PA.

ix. WILLIAM HAYS, b. 1779, Dauphin Co., PA.

x. SOLOMON HAYS, b. 1781 Dauphin County, PA.

xi. JOSEPH HAYS, b. 1783.

6. WILLIAM 3 HAYS (Patrick 2, ?1) wsa born 1742 in Dauphin Co., PA and died August 26, 1804 in near Mercersburg, Franklin Co., PA.  He married JEAN TAYLOR October 06, 1767 in Old Paxton Church, Harrisburg, PA.

Notes-Soon after his marriage to Jean Taylor – a direct line from both the house of Scots and the Crown of England, he moved with Samuel to near present day Staunton, Augusta Co., VA.  He lived there until 1777 when he moved to Franklin County (then Cumberland), PA just 15 miles from the maryland border.  he lived on 200 acres near Peters Township just a few miles northwest of Mercersburg.  His farm adjoined President James Buchanan.  He enlisted in the Colonial Army under Capt. Wm. Huston, Cumberland Co.  This later became the 6th and 11th Battalions under Archibald McAlister, a relative by marriage.  His wife was the mid-wife of the area and on 23 April 1791 she brought into this world the 15th President of the U.S., James Buchanan.  He died with his wife during the Cholera Epidemic of Franklin County.  They are buried in the Church Hill Cemetery 2.5 miles east of Mercersburg.  James Buchanan, the father of the President, wrote William’s will.

Children of William Hays and Jean Taylor are:

10. i. SAMUEL 4 HAYS, b. 1768, Augusta Co., VA; d. April 5, 1835 Franklin Co., PA.

11. ii. PATRICK HAYS, b. 1770 Augusta Co., VA; d. September 06, 1823 Franklin Co., PA.

iii. DAVID HAYS, b. 1772 Augusta Co., Va.

iv. NANCY HAYS, b. 1774 Augusta Co., VA.

v. JEAN HAYS, b. 1776 Augusta Co., VA.

vi. ELEANOR HAYS, b. November 21, 1779, Franklin Co., PA m. ? CUMMINGS, 1801.

vii. MARY HAYS, b. 1781, Franklin Co., PA; d. 1792 Franklin Co., PA.

viii. MARTHA HAYS, b. Abt. 1787, Franklin Co., PA; m. JAMES BOYD, April 12, 1821.

ix. ESTHER HAYS, b. May 24, 1789, Mercersburg, PA.

Generation No. 4

7. JAMES HAYS (Samual 3, Patrick 2, ?1) was born 1758 in Augusta Co., VA and died 1830 in Montgomery Co., Missouri.  He married (1) REBECCA HENDRICK May 10, 1784 in Lincoln, KY, daughter of John Hendrick and Elizabeth.  He married (2) SARAH KNOWLES SMITH 1820.

Notes-James Hays, son of Samuel Hays, Sr. was born in Augusta County, Virginia,, Date unknown. Here he lived until the family moved to Rutherford County, North Carolina.  James moved to Davidson County, Tennessee (now Sumner County) by 1783 where he ended a land preemption right of 640 acres on the East Fork of Station Camp Creek.  Oddly enough this is just across the Cumberland River from Col. Robert Hays, Harmon Hays, and by 1804-The Hermitage.  James appears on the 1790 census for Lincoln County, KY. 1800 list a James, Hugh, John, and William on the Lincoln County tax list and James on the Warren County, KY tax list.  James also appears on the 1820 census for Warren County and in 1830 on the Montgomery Co., Missouri along with a John and Samuel in the Upper Loutre Township.

May 10, 1784 James married Rebecca Hendrick in Lincoln County, KY (this county includes lands just north of the Tennessee state line and south of the Green River).  There is little doubt that this is the same James Hays that is mentioned by General William Hall in his eyewitness account of the attack on Greenfield Fort in Sumner County, Tennessee, on April 28, 1793 by 260 Indians.  General Hall relates, “I told (Wm) Neely, who with Hays and joined us, to take a chance at his (Indian)…, He mounted the fence and deliberately looking about him, Hays, who was read for him, took cool aim, and shooting him through the armpits, he fell over backwards upon a hill of corn, quite dead, the blood spurting out a foot on each side of him… .”  James Hays was cited to Secretary Daniel Smith as “a young man (who) behaved with great bravery for which he deserves th notice of his countrymen.”

James had 6 children born in Tennessee before moving to Warren County, Kentucky, by 1798.  This year, 1798, was the arrival date of James’ father and brothers from North Carolina.  James was the father of ten children, 7 boys and 3 girls by his wife Rebecca before she died sometime after 1810.

James remarried in 1820 to Mrs. Sarah (Knowles) Smith and in 1830 they along with five of their children and their respective families moved to Montgomery County, Missouri.  Some of his children returned to Kentucky, but James and his wife Sarah no doubt died and were buried in Missouri.

Either his or his fathers prayer book containing all the family information was last seen with Marshall Hays.  Marshall’s daughter, Bitsy Gross, does not recall finding it after Marshall’s death.

Children of James Hays and Rebecca Hendrick are;

12. i. JOHN 5 HAYS, b. 1785 Lincoln Co., KY; d. unknown.

13. ii. SAMUEL HAYS, b. Abt 1787, Sumner Co., TN; d. June 07, 1874 Warren Co., KY.

iii. JEREMIAH HAYS, b. Abt 1788, Sumner Co., TN; d. unknown; m. MARTHA DOYLE, 1808.

iv. DAVID HAYS, b. Abt 1794 Sumner Co., TN; d. Bef 1824; m. RACHEL BURGHER.

v. JAMES HAYS, JR., b. Abt. 1796, Sumner Co., TN; m. REBECCA ADAIR, 1817.

14. vi. ELIZABETH HAYS, b. 1797 Sumner Co., TN; d. 1871.

15. vii. WILLIAM HAYS, b. 1799 Warren Co., KY; d. 1881.

viii. FRANCES HAYS, b. 1802 Warren Co., KY; m. JEREMIAH THOMAS, 1820.

ix. EVALINE HAYS b. 1805 Warren Co., KY; m. JEREMIAH THOMAS, 1820.

16. x. ANDREW B. R. HAYS, b. Abt 1810, Warren Co., KY.

8.  WILLIAM 4 HAYS, SR. (Samuel 3, Patrick 2, ?1) ws born on March 10, 1761 in Augusta Co., VA and died September 25, 1851 in Warren Co., KY.  He married (1) FRANCES ANN CHITWOOD 1786, daughter of James Chitwood.  He married (2) ELIZABETH GREATHOUSE 1805. He married (3) NANCY HAYNES 1841.

Children of William Hays and Frances Chitwood are:

17. i. JOHN 5 HAYS, b. 1787 Rutherford Co., NC; d 1821

ii. SAMUEL HAYS, b. Abt 1789, Rutherford Co., NC m. Sarah Hays 1817.

18. iii. JAMES CHITWOOD HAYS, b. Abt. 1790 Rutherford Co., NC; d. 1833

19. iv. WILLIAM HAYS, JR. b. Abt 1792 Rutherford Co., NC; d 1824.

20. v. SHADRACK HAYS, b. Abt 1794 Rutherford Co., NC; d 1843.

21. vi. MOSES HAYS, b. Abt 1796 Rutherford Co., NC; d. 1843.

22. vii. DANIEL HAYS, b. 1799 Rutherford Co., NC; d. 1862 Warren Co., KY.

9. PATRICK 4 HAYS (Robert 3, Patrick 2, ? 1) was born in 1767 in Dauphin Co., PA and died July 28, 1857 in Oakville, Cumberland Co., PA.  He married MARGARET MICKEY January 10, 1810.

Notes-Moved to Cumberland County, PA about 1820.

Children of Patrick Hays and Margaret Mickey are;

i. ISAMIAH 5 HAYS, m. ALEXANDER W. STERRITT.

ii. ROBERT MICKEY HAYS, b. May 25, 1813, Dauphin Co., PA; d. March 04, 1888, Newville, Cumberland Co., PA.

iii. MARGARET HAYS

iv. MARY ANN HAYS.

v. LUCETTA HAYS

vi. JANE HAYS.

10. SAMUEL 4 HAYS (William 3, Patrick 2, ? 1) was bron in 1768 in Augusta Co., VA and died April 05, 1835 in Franklin Co., PA.  He married MARY A LEIDY 1810.

Children of Samuel Hays and Mary Leidy are:

i. WILLIAM 5 HAYS, b. March 23, 1811 Franklin Co., PA; d. September 21, 1896 New Harrison, OH; m. SUSAN BARRICK, April 18, 1833 Louden, PA.

ii. JANE HAYS, b. July 30, 1812 Franklin Co., PA.

iii. GEORGE HAYS, b. July 30, 1814 Franklin Co., PA.

24. iv. ELEANOR HAYS, b. February 5, 1816 Franklin Co., PA; d. June 27, 1877 near Greenville, OH.

v. MARY ANN HAYS, b. January 26, 1817, Franklin Co., PA.

vi. SAMUEL HAYS, b. November 08, 1818 Franklin Co., PA; d. October 25, 1854 Darke Co., OH.

vii. REBECCA HAYS, b. January 10, 1821 Franklin Co., PA.

viii. CATHERINE HAYS, b. September 28, 1823 Franklin Co., PA.

ix. CHARLES G. HAYS, b. December 14, 1824 Franklin Co., PA; d. April 10, 1898; m. SARAH M. ADAMS October 26, 1848, Piqua, OH.

25. x. DANIEL S. HAYS, b. September 11, 1826 Franklin Co., PA; d. April 11, 1904 Grand Island, NE.

xi. ROBERT HAYS, b. April 15, 1828 Franklin Co., PA.

xii. JOHN HAYS, b. March 18, 1833 Franklin Co., PA; d. March 10, 1893 Greenville, OH; m. (1) ELIZABETH A. (2) ELIZABETH LYSER September 16, 1875.

xiii. MARGARET E. HAYS, b. March 31, 1835 Franklin Co., PA; d. December 17, 1921 Covington, Miami Co., OH.

11. PATRICK 4 HAYS, (William 3, Patrick 2, ? 1) Wass  born in 1770 in Augusta Co., VA and died September 06, 1823 in Franklin Co., PA.  He married AGNES NANCY CUMMINS 1805 in Franklin Co., PA.

Notes-Capt. Patrick of War of 1812, Commander of Mercersburg Company.

Child of Patrick Hays and Agnes Cummins is;

i. JANE LOUISE 5 HAYS

Generation No. 5

12 JOHN 5 HAYS (James 4, Samuel 3, Patrick 2, ? 1) was born 1785 in Lincoln Co., KY and died unknown. He married MARY HENDRICK 1801.

The child of John Hays and Mary Hendrick is;

i. JANE LOUISE 5 HAYS.

13 SAMUEL HAYS (James 4, Samuel 3, Patrick 2, ?1) was born Abt 1787 in Sumner Co., TN and died June 07, 1874 in Warren Co., KY. He married (1) CHARLOTTA MANNEN March 08, 1812 in Warren Co., KY, daughter of William Mannen and Patience Phillips.  He married (2) SALLIE LARK 1861.

Notes-Buried on Trent Hays Farm on US 68 in Sunnyside, KY.  This was his homestead.  The house is now gone but a small graveyard is still there.

Children of Samuel Hays and Charlotta Mannen are;

i. HANNAH 6 HAYS, b. January 11, 1813, Warren Co., KY.

ii. ELLENDER HAYS, b. February 17, 1815 Warren Co., KY; d. May 8, 1874; m. JOHN TYGRET, JR. 1837.

iii. ELIZABETH HAYS, b. October 17, 1818 Warren Co., KY; d. May 01, 1867; m. DANIEL W. HAYS, 1841.

iv. DAVID C. HAYS, b. October 10, 1820 Warren Co., KY; m. MARTHA A. ROBINSON, 1849.

27. v. JAMES SAMUEL HAYS, b. May 10, 1822 Bowling Green, KY; d. August 27, 1860, Marlin, TX.

28. vi. ASA MANNEN HAYS, b. December 14, 1823 Warren Co., KY; d. May 29, 1898.

vii. LILLIE HAYS, b. January 06, 1826 Warren Co., KY; d. August 1841.

14. ELIZABETH HAYS (James 4, Samuel 3, Patrick 2, ? 1) was born in 1797 in Sumner Co., TN and died 1871.  She married JOHN THOMAS 1812.

Children of Elizabeth Hays and John Thomas are;

i. KATHERINE THOMAS, b. 1813; m. JOSEPH PRICE GILMORE 1832.

ii. REBECCA THOMAS, b. 1816; m. LEWIS W. POTTER, JR. 1837.

iii. JEREMIAH THOMAS, b. 1817.

iv. HENRY THOMAS, b. 1829; d. 1847; m. SARAH PHILLIPS 1840.

v. ELVINA THOMAS, b. 1822; d. 1909; m. WILLIAM C. THOMAS.

vi. JOHN S. THOMAS, b. 1824; d. 1909; m. MARTHA PATILLO.

vii. SAMUEL THOMAS, b. 1826; m. DORORTHEA C. EDWARDS 1856.

viii. SAMUEL THOMAS, b. 1829; m. (1) REBECCA HAYS 1858 (2) ANGELINA HERDON 1867 (3) FRANCES LUCAS 1880.

ix. JESSE W. THOMAS, b. 1833; d. 1920; m. (1) MARY MANNEN (2) PARADIE HAYNES.

15. WILLIAM 5 HAYS (James 4, Samuel 3, Patrick 2, ? 1) wsa born 1799 in Warren Co., KY and died 1881. He married NANCY LYNN 1821.

Children of William Hays and Nancy Lynn are;

i. REBECCA A. 6 HAYS, m. JOHN C. THOMAS 1840.

ii. MARTHA L.A. HAYS, b. 1825; d. 1895; m. RICHARD G. POTTER.

iii. ELIZABETH A. HAYS, m. THOMAS L. THORTON, 1846.

iv. JAMES EDWARD HAYS, b. 1829; m. EMALINE G. MORRIS 1850.

v. MARY JANE HAYS, b. 1830; d. 1914; m. JOHN EDLEY 1856.

vi. FRANCIES ANN HAYS, b. 1833; d. 1884.

vii. WILLIAM JEFFERSON HAYS, b. 1836; m. C.E. TYGRET 1875.

viii. HENRY M. HAYS, b. 1838; d. 1912; m. (1) JUDITH KEITH 1861 (2) ERMINE SMITH 1900 (3) CHLOE BAILEY 1905.

ix. NANCY ANN HAYS b. 1840; d. 1856.

x. MARGARET J. HAYS, b. 1842; d. 1855.

16. ANDREW B. R. 5 HAYS (William 4, Samuel 3, Patrick 2, ?1) was born Abt 1810 in Warren Co., KY.  He married (1) JULIA LOWE 1834 (2) NANCY LOWE 1844

Children of Andrew Hays and Julia Lowe are;

i. WILLIAM PRIOR 6 HAYS, b. 1836; m. CORNELIA GOTT 1870.

ii. JOSEPH JULIAN HAYS, b. 1842; d. 1934; m. (1) SARAH J. LARK 1865 (2) NANCY WHITE 1880.

iii. NANCY HAYS.

17. JOHN 5 HAYS (William 4, Samuel 3, Patrick 2, ?1) was born in 1787 Rutherford Co., NC and died 1821.  He married SUSANNAH SNOW 1809.

Children of John Hays and Susannah Snow are:

i. ? 6 HAYS, b. 1810; m. JOHN CLASPIL.

ii. JAMES B. HAYS, b. 1817; m. NANCY BRIDGES 1838.

iii. MARTHA A. HAYS, b 1821; m. ANDREW J. LONG 1851.

18. JAMES CHITWOOD 5 HAYS (William 4, Samuel 3, Patrick 2, ?1) was boRn Abt 1790 in Rutherford Co., NC and died 1833.  He married (1) MARY LORTON 1812 (2) LYDIA WRIGHT 1828.

Children of James Hays and Mary Lorton are;

i. FRANCES 6 HAYS, m. THOMAS GILMORE 1834.

ii. MARY HAYS m. ? MCCOY.

iii. WILLIAM HARRISON HAYS, b. Abt 1818; m. MARY GRINSTEAD 1842.

iv. MARGARET HAYS m. JOHN S. WADDELL.

v. JESTRIGHT HAYS.

vi. SUSANNAH HAYS, b. 1823; m. JOHN S. WADDELL 1845. 

19. WILLIAM 5 HAYS, JR. (William 4, Samuel 3, Patrick 2, ?1) was born Abt. 1792 in Rutherford Co., NC and died 1824.  He married NANCY NEWPORT 1815.

Children of William Hays and Nancy Newport are:

i. REED NEWPORT 5 HAYS, m. MATILDA ADAIR, 1837.

ii. PLEASANT CHITWOOD HAYS, b. 1820; d. 1885; m. ELIZABETH ANN HENDRICKS, 1842.

iii. DANIEL W. HAYS, b. 1822; d. 1880; m. ELIZABETH HAYS 1841.

20. SHADRACK 5 HAYS (William 4, Saumeul 3, Patrick 2, ?1) was born Abt 1794 in Rutherford Co., NC and died 1843. He married (1) SARAH OSBORN, (2) ELIZABETH NEWPORT, 1823.

Children of Shamrock Hays and Elizabeth Newport are;

i. WILLIAM F. 6 HAYS b. 1824; m. MARY LUCINDA.

ii. KEZIAH P. HAYS b. 1826.

iii. NANCY HAYS b. 1828; m. JAMES LOWERY 1845.

iv. LURANNA C. HAYS, b. 1830.

v. JOHN W. HAYS b. 1832.

vi. JOSEPH ERVAN HAYS b. 1834; m. SARAH PARADINE GOOD, 1855.

vii. SOLOMAN PORTER HAYS, b. 1836.

viii. DANIEL CALVIN HAYS b. 1838; m. RACHEL E. HAYS 1861.

x. ELIZABETH FRANCES HAYS b. 1842.

21.  MOSES 5 HAYS (William 4, Samuel 3, Patrick 2, ?1) was born Abt. 1796 in Rutherford Co. NC and died 1843. He married (1) CANDA, (2) ELIZABETH DAVIS 1822.

Children of Moses 5 Hays and Canda are:

i. SHADRACK 5 HAYS b. 1819

ii. FRANCES HAYS b. 1819.

Children of Moses Hays and Elizabeth Davis are:

i. NANCY 6 HAYS b. 1826; m. MATTHEW PHILLIPS 1849.

ii. MARY HAYS b. 1828.

iii. WILLIAM HAYS b. 1830.

22. DANIEL 5 HAYS (William 4, Samuel 3, Patrick 2, ?1) was born 1799 in Rutherford Co., NC and died 1862 in Warren Co., KY. He married REBECCA ANN MANNEN 1829.

Notes-Daniel Hays was a very wealthy man who owned over 3000 acres on the Barren River and over 30 slaves at his death.  Unfortunately the loss of his slaves and the robbery told below left his widow without much except land.

Court cases prove that after Daniels death a group of masked robbers robbed the family homestead out on Hays Crossing (Ben Thompson’s Ford) south of Bowling Green on the Barren River.  Ten’s of thousands were taken (a great sum in the 1860’s) from the widow, however the clever Hayses hid a great sum under the baby and told the robbers the baby had the measles.  The robbers were brought to trial and acquitted because nobody could see their faces, although people knew who did it.  Afterward the Hays shot up the robbers house and were brought to trial and acquitted also.

Children of Daniel Hays and Rebecca Mannen are:

i. WILLIAM HARDY 6 HAYS b. 1829; d. 1871.

ii. ELIZABETH FRANCES RAY HAYS b. 1832; d. 1870; m. JOSEPH ROBERSON 1850.

iii. NANCY CAROLINE HAYS b. 1834; d. 1890; m. (1) EDMUND WHITE (2) WILLIAM RENICK 1850.

iv. MARIAH EMALINE T. HAYS b. 1837; d. 1922; m. MATHEW J. MOTLEY 1854.

v. JOHN HENRY HARRISON HAYS b. 1840; d. 1890; m. FANNIE LORNE.

vi. REBECCA DANIEL HAYS b. 1842; d. 1866; m. SAMUEL THOMAS 1858.

29. vii. ASA THOMAS MANNEN HAYS b. 1845; d. 1901.

viii. DANIEL JAMES HAYS b. 1848; d. 1871.

ix. ELIJAH HISE HAYS b. 1851; d. 1895; m. MARIAH ADDIE GREER 1871.

x. MARY ALLIE HAYS b. 1853; d. 1937; m. WILLIAM GARRISON 1870.

xi. CHARLOTTE MANNEN HAYS b. 1857; d. 1938; m. HARMON SMITH HUNT 1880.

30. xii. FRANKLIN PIERCE HAYS b. 1860 Warren Co., KY; d. 1941 Warren Co., KY.

23. ROBERT MICKEY 5 HAYS (Patrick 4, Robert 3, Patrick 2, ?1) was born May 25, 1813 in Dauphin Co., PA and died March 04, 1888 in Newville, Cumberland Co., PA.  He married HANNAH SHARPE daughter of John Sharpe and Jane McCune.

Children of Robert Hays and Hannah Sharpe are;

i. MARGARET 6 HAYS, d. before 1905; m. SAMUEL I. IRVINE.

31. ii. JOHN SHARPE HAYS, b. August 06, 1842 Newville, Cumberland Co., PA; d. March 29, 1877 Newville, Cumberland Co., PA.

32. iii. EDWIN R. HAYS b. May 10, 1846.

iv. JANE HAYS.

24. ELEANOR 5 HAYS (Samuel 4, William 3, Patrick 2, ?1) was born February 05, 1816 in Franklin Co., PA and died June 27, 1887 near Greenville, OH. She married DAVID BISHOP April 21, 1836.

Children of Eleanor Hays and David Bishop are:

i. MARY JANE 6 BISHOP b. December 12, 1837 Frederick Co., MD; d Abt. 1852 Darke Co., OH.

ii. DAVID BISHOP b. April 09, 1839 Frederick Co., MD; d. April 26, 1845 Enroute to OH.

iii. WILLIAM HARRISON BISHOP b. January 15, 1841 Frederick Co., MD; d. May 12, 1845 Enroute to OH.

iv. MARGARET ANN BISHOP b. March 19, 1842 Frederick Co., MD; d. May 07, 1845 Enroute to OH.

v. SAMUEL BISHOP b. October 28, 1843 Frederick Co., MD; d. March 04, 1911 Darke Co., OH; m. NANCY FRANCES DIVELY February 12, 1875.

vi. WILLIAM BISHOP b. November 22, 1845; d. December 29, 1846.

vii. HARRIET BISHOP b. September 24, 1848; d. October 04, 1932.

33. viii. JOSEPH BISHOP b. September 24, 1848 Darke Co., OH; d. June 05, 1827 Miami Co., OH.

34. ix. NANCY BELLE BISHOP b. February 24, 1851; d. March 1922 Darke Co., OH.

35. x. SARAH ANN BISHOP b. March 18, 1853; d. March 12, 1938.

25. DANIEL S. 5 HAYS (Samuel 4, William 3, Patrick 2, ?1) was born September 11, 1826 in Franklin Co., PA and died April 11, 1904 in Grand Island, NE. He married SUSANAH WORLEY in Covington, Miami Co., OH.

Children of Daniel Hays and Susanah Worley is:

i. HENRY 6 HAYS.

26. MARGARET E. 5 HAYS (Samuel 4, William 3, Patrick 2, ?1) was born March 31, 1835 in Franklin Co., PA and died December 17, 1921 in Covington, Miami Co., OH. She married BEN HOLLOPETER July 21, 1864.

Children of Margaret Hays and Ben Hollopeter are:

i. REBECCAH 6 HOLLOPETER b. Abt 1859.

ii. GEORGE WASHINGTON HOLLOPETER b. March 11, 1866.

iii. MARTHA ELIZABETH HOLLOPETER b. October 31, 1867; m. ? ORR.

iv. ELMER ELLIS ELSWORTH HOLLOPETER b. September 11, 1869.

v. MARY MARIAH HOLLOPETER b. Abt 1871; m. ? SWIGART.

vi. MATTIE HOLLOPETER b. Abt 1873.

vii. CATHERINE BELLE HOLLOPETER b. October 18, 1873.

viii. MARY L. HOLLOPETER b. October 18, 1873.

ix. MARTHA E. HOLLOPETER b. Abt 1874.

Generation No. 6

27. JAMES SAMUEL 6 HAYS (Samuel 5, James 4, Samuel 3, Patrick 2, ?1) was born May 10, 1822 in Bowling Green, KY and died August 27, 1860 in Marlin, TX.  He married FRANCES ALLEN, daughter of ? Allen and ? Knight.

Generation 6 is 3 generations from JBH.  For further information on this line or to contact JBH email me at jh@americanman.org and I’ll forward it to him. 

Scotch, Scot, and Scots: a whiskey, a man, and a language.

Years back when my initial investigation into my Hays history revealed the name was of Scottish origin and related to Clan Hay (http://www.clanhay.org) I got a kilt in the proper Clan Hay tartan, picked up a CD of Highland Celtic folk songs, and headed off to the local highland games.  But DNA testing and my genealogical research over these past few years revealed there are two regions in Scotland, Highland and Lowland with the line running south-west, the exact boundary not clearly defined.  In addition to cultural differences in each of these a distinct language was spoken with Scottish Gaelic spoken in the highlands and Scots spoken in the lowlands.

Scottish Gaelic is a Celtic language.  The peoples first migrating into Ireland, Scotland, and England after the last ice age were Celtic speakers which descended from Proto-Celtic in Western Europe and the Iberian Peninsula.  Today these include Irish Gaelic, Scottish Gaelic, Manx, Welsh, Breton, and Cornish. Scots is a branch of Teutonic (Proto-Germanic) languages, a branch of the Old English language with Old English being brought into the isles by germanic tribes, Angles and Saxons.  Old English split into Scots and English.  Today they include English, Lowland Scots, and Ulster Scots. 

Picts in the highlands spoke a Celtic tongue which differed from the language of the Gaelic Kingdom of Dalriada which covered the western seaboard of Scotland and Northeast Ireland.  In the 9th century they combined in the north of Scotland, then called Alba.  “Scot” and “Scotland” is derived from latin (Scoti), initially applied to all Gauls but by the 11th century it was used only for the Gaelic speakers in the highlands. Eventually Scot was applied to the all people in the Country.  So, ironically, the name of the language, Scots, comes from the Romans describing Gaelic Highlanders speaking Gaelic.

In the 5th and 6th century germanic tribes, Angles, and Saxons, began arriving on the east coast of Scotland and England speaking Old English (Angle ish).  The land controlled by them was known as Northumbria (east coast of Northern England and Southern Scotland).  Over the centuries, as Clans and Kings pushed each other around over time, Old English and Scots diverged and by the 12th century split into English in present day England and Scots in present day lowland Scotland, with Scots-Gaelic spoken in the highlands.  

References to differences between Scots (non-Gaeilic speakers) and Wild Scots (Gaels) appear in the mid 13th century with Scots referenced in written records after 1350.  John Barbours poem The Brus about about Robert the Bruce was in Scots and written in 1375. More frequent Scots written records start to appear in the late 1300’s and early 1400’s and in 1492 King James I of Scotland wrote The Kingis Quair (The Kings Book) in Scots.  Records of Scotlands Parliament are now being kept in Scots.

In 1456 Gilbert Hay’s The Buke of the Law of Armys is the earliest dated work to be translated from another language into Scots, in this instance French.  In 1901 The Scottish Text Society published Gilbert of the Haye’s Prose Manuscript (AD1456) Volume I. The Buke of the Law of Armys or Buke of Battles.  The Introduction informs us there is a folio in a Library at Abbotsford which contains the earliest dated literary prose in the Scottish Language.  Made in 1456, in Roslin Castle, at the command of the Earl of Orkney and Caithness, Chancellor of Scotland, by Sir Gilbert Haye, knight, late chamberlain to the King of France.

Sir Gilbert Haye, the Translator (Introduction pg. xxiii) is described as a poet rather than a prose writer.  While much about him is speculation, such as his lineage may be from Sir William Hay of Locharet.  Records at St. Andrews dated 1418 have a Gilbert’s Hay receiving a Bachelor in Decrees and in 1419 Gilbertus de Haya signing up for a Master of Arts degree.  He is referenced as both a Knight and Priest and spent 24 years in France in service to the King there, possibly serving with the Scots Guard.  Those interested in Hay history may enjoy the 119 page Introduction which speaks of Gilbert Hay, the manuscript, and the people involved.    

From the Buke of the Law of Armys in Scots Language

In the mid 16th century Standard English began to predominate the other languages as it was the language of trade and business and most printed materials in Great Britain were in English.  An example is the Geneva Bible which was translated into English and published in Scotland in 1579 and a law was passed in Scotland requiring every household of sufficient means to buy a copy.  Presbyterian Ministers quoting from it would then translate into Scots for their audience.  When in 1603 King James VI of Scotland became James I of England he addressed the English Parliament, “Hath not God first united these two Kingdomes both in Language, Religion, and similitude of maners?”. And in 1604 the Church of Scotland, the Kirk, noted the Authorized King James version of the bible, which was in English, was the official book. 

In 1609 Scottish Planters offered land in Ulster came from the western lowlands of Scotland where Scots was the common tongue and migrations from the lowlands was encouraged to help alleviate border problems.  Many more Scots left the lowlands for Ulster during the 1600’s due to religious and economic persecution adding to the Scots speakers in Ulster.  Today the language is referred to as Ulster-Scots, which many consider a dialect of Scots. 

The Ulster Scots Language Society says Ulster Scots was being spoken in the Americas in the early 1700’s, settlers speaking “their ain mother tongue”.   There are many references found in literature of the time regarding the “rough English” of the Ulster Scots in America which I suspect was Scots or at a minimum a heavy Scots influence on the English used at the time.  

John Hays Diary and Journal of 1760 of his expedition into Indian Country in PA transcribed from writing in his own hand in 1760 provides a clue that those Ulster Scots in who received an education did so in English as his writing, although with misspelling and grammar mistakes common to the time, appears to be English.  He was reportedly born in Northern Ireland but brought to America when he was 2 so his formal education would be in the states.  It is most likely that Ulster Scots and Scots in Scotland could switch back and forth between speaking Scots and English, often combining the two, at least well enough for their “rough English” to be understood. Those educated to read and write were in English as the available written works of the time were in English, the primary book being the bible.

But just as Old English from Europe evolved into Scots in Scotland and then into Ulster-Scots in Northern Ireland, it appears that in America it was absorbed into American English as were terms and phrases from British English, Indian languages, French, German, Spanish, and other immigrants.  As an example, Schenectady, NY (where I grew up). The name is from a Mohawk Indian term “Schau-naugh-ta-da” meaning “beyond the pines” and pronounced Ska-nect-ta-dee by the original dutch settlers in the 1660’s. Across the Mohawk River the lone non-Dutch original settler, a Scot named Alexander Lindsey Glen, named his patent (land grant) “Scotia” after his homeland and the Village of Scotia in the Town of Glenville exists to this day.

Although I could find not specific reference in writings of the time some claim the term “Red Neck” originated in the Ulster Scots in America as Covenanters, lowland Scot Presbyterians, wore a red neckerchief. This is quite possible as the pioneers militias when in battle had no uniforms and to distinguish your side from the other it was common to wear an identifying piece of cloth on clothes or hat to prevent friendly fire incidents. It isn’t a far stretch of the imagination to believe a term used for the Scot and Ulster Scot Presbyterians would follow them to America.

Studies show that generally first generation immigrants to America use their own language at home, the first generation born here will be somewhat conversational in the old language but not able to read and write it, and the third generation can neither speak or understand the mother tongue having taken up the local language. Early American pioneers most assuredly combined words and phrases from other languages as they developed the common tongue in America.

As Scots was a spoken language and English the written language we have no record of how long Scots was used in America.  Most likely the less educated, the pioneers and settlers, used it longer than those next to or within English settlements.  Many believe that the unique dialect in the Appalachian Mountains traces back to Scots but there is no direct proof of this.  But what we today call English in America is certainly different than English in Great Britain, Australia, Scotland, etc.  And even in America the language changes from north to south and east to west. 

But we can still find reference to the old Scots tongue in America when poets gather at Robbie Burn readings and on New Years Eve when we sing Auld Lang Syne in Scots (here mixed with a highland influence), or here with Scots and English subtitles for comparison. 

Interestingly, in “The Scots: A Genetic Journey” Alistair Moffat writes that there is a DNA marker which correlates to the Scots who spoke Gaelic.  S145 is a variant of the M269 marker and it appears in 48% of Welshmen and only 15% in neighboring England.  In Scotland it’s in 31% of men in Glasgow and the southwest dropping to 22% in Edinburg.   My DNA downstream of M269 lacks the marker, consistent with the presumed history of my Hays coming to Scotland from Normandy with no connection to the highlands.  As DNA research progresses we may be able to further accurately trace our ancestries where no paper trail exists.

A good video of the Scots Language and differences from English, The Scot’s Language, can be found here.  The Scots Language Center contains much information on the Scots Language.  The Ulster-Scots Language Society has information on their Scots language, as does the Ulster-Scot Academy.   And for differences in American English versus UK English the video, How are Biritsh English and American English different, is here.

I close wishing you Lang may yer lum reek! (May you live long and stay well.)

Patrick (PA) related to John (VA) related to Patrick (VA)????

Just as we almost all go back to a common ancestor in Africa 60,000 years ago I am beginning to wonder if there is common Hays ancestor of the Ulster Scot Presbyterian Hays’ who migrated first to Pennsylvania, then VA and ultimately TN and KY when the Cumberland Gap opened.  Naming patterns common the Ulster Scots are used here also to assume relation.  The 1st born male was usually named for the Paternal Grandfather, 2nd for the Maternal Grandfather, 3rd & 4th after an uncle.  The name of a child who died in infancy was often used again in the same family.  “Nephew” in written records refers to Grandsons and it wasn’t until around the Revolutionary war that we begin to see middle names used and the addition of a Sr or Jr. and “Grandson” used. 

FamilyTreeDNA offers Y-DNA tests with 12, 25, 37, 67, 111 markers, and Big Y-700 (which doesn’t give you a probability for relationships (more later).  I recently received my “Big Y-700” test results back and the listed most common ancestor for those I match with are both Patrick Hays of PA and John Hays of VA, assuming their posted family trees are correct.  The Big y test showed a close match with JBH who identified Patrick Hays (PA) as the Earliest Known Ancestor (EKN) and we have a common Y-DNA Haplogroup of R-FT115175.  The 111 test shows a JSH (R-M269) with a genetic distance of 5 related to Patrick Hays and JBH again with a genetic distance of 6. The 67 marker shows JSH at a genetic distance of 3, EGH (R-M269) with a genetic distance of 3 and the EKA as John Hays, 1752 Rockbridge, VA.  (initials of people used to politely mask identities).

As I understand it (remember I am an amateur!, go to https://isogg.org, International Society of Genetic Genealogy for more), the Genetic Distance is the number of differences in a tested marker, Short Tandem Repeat (STR) and the test number is the number of markers tested.  The Big Y looks at 700 STR’s and also tests Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNP, “snips”) which help identify paternal lineages 10-20 generations back.  For example, there are 15 markers between me and my closest match, JSH (R-M269) as I took a larger test.  Again ISOGG and FTDNA have much more information on these (and other DNA) topics.

The records (Chalkley) show a John Hays (wife Rebecca) and children self importing to Rockbridge, VA in 1740 and on the same day a Patrick Hays (wife Frances) with children.  John Hays also has grown sons who arrived in VA the same time as he did.  Many sites suspect these two are brothers which is incorrect (IMHO).  The Bibliographic Encyclopedia of Dauphin County, PA (Encyclopedia) show that a Patrick Hays (wife Jean) arrived in Derry PA with his brother Hugh, William, and James.  Patrick (PA) and Patrick (VA) having different wives and children names obviously aren’t the same person.  So what is the relationship between the three and can my DNA test help?

Biographical Encyclopedia of Dauphin County, PA

Patrick (PA) was born in 1705 in County Donnegal, Ireland and came to PA in 1728 with his brothers.  It is quite possible that other Hays’ came at the same time, remember, it was not uncommon for nearly the entire Church memberships or villages to leave for the Americas at the same time on the same ship, or perhaps they came shortly after with Patrick (PA) as as a stopping off point.  Beverly Manor (1736) and the Borden Grant (1739) hadn’t been open to settlement yet.  It also appears that Patrick (PA), John (VA) and Patrick (VA) were men of some means as they paid their passage (most came over indentured, more on that in a later blog) and could afford to purchase land.  PA offered 50 acres to each man under the headlight system but much of the available good farm land was taken and more expensive to buy.  The Borden Grant offered 100 acres for self importers (you had to put up a cabin and settle) and each 100 acres for a shilling.     

Biographical Encyclopedia of Dauphin County, PA

By my calculations I estimate that John (VA) and Patrick (PA) are 8 generation from me (possibly 9).  My closest match at 111 markers, JSH shows Patrick (PA) as EKA and the comparison chart estimates that there is a 76.48% probability and at 67 markers a 85.82% probability.  EGH who has John (VA) as her EKA also has a 67 marker 85.82% probability.   MBH at 67 shows a 51.48% probability and at 111 a 61.51% probability at 8 generations.  I’m not sure why the percentages move like they do and I’ll need to do more research on that.  The fact that my closest match JBH has a lower probability leads me to believe that my line does not go through John (VA) or Patrick (PA) Hays and might go through Patrick (VA) or another Hays related to him.  At 10 generations JSH is at (111) 89.48 and (67) 93.34, JBH is (111) 79.93% and (67) 69.62, and EGH (67) is 93.34.  At 12 generation EGH is (67) 97.09%, JSH is (111) 95.74%, and JBH (111) is 90.67%.     

Using the name patterns common to Ulster Scots I see that Patrick (PA) has Brothers Hugh, William, and James and his son’s are (in birth order) David, Robert, William, Samuel, and Patrick.  Patrick (VA) has sons named William and Samuel.  John (VA) has sons Andrew, Charles, John, and James (deceased by 1750) with Grandsons named James and John, Jr.  This indicates to me that Patrick (VA) is the nephew of Patrick (PA) with no indication if Hugh, William, or James is his father.  John (VA) and Patrick (PA) are not brothers and the lack of a common name in their family trees indicates that their relationship is further than their Grandfathers.  

 Patrick (PA) and John (VA) sit 8 generations from me, their Grandfathers 10 but it is at 12 generations that probabilities go above 90% for all connected to me on Family Tree DNA.  So going back to 12 generations from me to 1650 if A Hays had 4 sons (1675) and each of them had 4 sons (1700) which includes the about year that John (VA) and Patrick (PA) were born the two of them would have 64 cousins.  And given the fact that the Ulster Scots in northern Ireland stayed among themselves due to their Presbyterian religion and that they came over to America in bulk, and given the DNA probabilities, it is highly likely that there is a Common Ancestor about the 1650’s.  

But given the lack of records prior to and into the 1700’s which can identify people and their relation to each other and given the fact that the Hays, after arriving in PA in the early 1700’s spread out to new territories as the nation expanded, being among the first pioneers to settle Greene, TN (closely following the Wautauga Settlement in 1776), among the original settlers of the Cumberland Settlement (1779, Nashville), and 1775 blazing the Wilderness Road through the Cumberland Gap into Kentucky and settling there, the record will end before we get to Northern Ireland and we’ll have to rely on DNA to finish the story.  To this end I encourage everyone to get their Y-DNA done at Family Tree DNA, https://www.familytreedna.com/, and find your relatives and ancestors there.  

My line going backwards has a James, Thomas Jefferson (obvious where that came from), Robert Alexander, William A., George, and William b. 1773 in Rockbridge, VA d. 1857 Greene, TN and that last is my wall (for now).  Patrick (PA) and Patrick (VA) both have William in their line so name matching has me suspect my line is through Patrick (PA) or one of his brothers (a father to Patrick (VA).  But only field research and luck will confirm this.

And the historical research continues.

Hays Ancestors: Mans east and west diaspora and the Hays migration to Scotland.

Although he didn’t know it, DNA Adam in Africa 60,000 years ago was a Hays.  He’s actually related to the vast majority of the people alive today so he has a pretty long list of surnames.  They were stone age hunter-gatherers when 60,000 years ago a DNA Adam son, a Hays male ancestor, started to migrate north out of Africa.  50,000 years ago the Hays cousins, the C Haplogroup, went west out of Africa over the tip of India and up the Asian coast to North America, the first settlers to that continent. When the Hays sons reached Asia 35,000 years ago, around present day Uzbekistan, cousins in Haplogroup Q went west northwest while the Hays, in the R Haplogroup, continued north.  Both The Hays R Haplogroup and cousins Q Haplogroup were still hunter-gatherer societies, dependent on climate and the movement of large game animals, about 11,000 years ago when Q went into North America at present day Alaska .  

The Hays R Haplogroup first split into R1 and R2 (some estimate about 25,000 years ago) and then the R1 split into R1a and R1b (some estimate about 18,500 years ago), with R1b being my (and many others) Hays line.  The R1b Hays continued to migrate west into Europe.  The climate at the time was much cooler than now due to the last Ice Age with glaciers that grew and receded back and forth from 110,000 to 12,500 years ago. In Scotland 24,000 years ago the ice was over a mile thick and Britain was connected to mainland Europe due to reduced sea levels from the glacier and migrations of people by foot in and out and in could occur.  Reduced sea levels due to glaciation opened up the Bering Land Bridge, Beringia, between present day Siberia and Alaska and about 12,000 to 15,000 years ago people began to migrate in and out of North America.

Glaciers and climate continued to impact movement of people.  The Q Haplogroup crossed into North America and continued to migrate south and east settling North and South America.  The Hays R1b Haplogroup continued further west into Europe.  As warming occurred 12,000 years ago the glaciers began to melt and recede and ocean levels began to rise.  By 6000 years ago the British Isles were separate from mainland Europe by the English Channel and Beringia was under water.  

The flooding of Beringia separated North America from Asia and migrations into North America stopped, but the Q Haplogroup continued their migration south and east across 2 continents.   90% of American Indians carry the Q Haplogroup.  As evidence of the America’s being separated from Asia and Europe, canines were domesticated from grey wolves by the hunter-gatherers some 14,000 years ago.  Travelers over Beringia brought dogs to North America and DNA studies have shown they were related to dogs in Siberia, but were distinct from European dog lines.  Among other herd animals, ancient horses originally from North America died out in North America but they continued in Asia.  North and South American civilizations remained isolated from the civilizations of Eurasia and did not benefit from any advances in Eurasia culture and developed on their own.

About 9000 years ago farming was developed in the fertile crescent in Mesopotamia (present day middle east).  Cereal crops (wheat and barley), lentils, peas and chickpeas were cultivated for food and flax was grown for oil.  Goats and sheep were domesticated as were chickens and pigs in China and cattle in the Near East.  Farming and pastoralism created a more sedentary lifestyle but successive generations would require more land in temperate zones to farm and graze on.  Stone age tools were improved on and pottery making developed to store grains and seeds.  

Farming increased birth rates as children were weaned earlier onto a grain diet (mush).  Villages and town centers (tribes and clans) would develop for social gathering, government, and religious activities and as a gathering point for common defense against raiding.  Increased populations increased the need for more land to farm and thus encouraged migration.  Genetic diversity within a village would be maintained by marriages between two villages.  This would build alliances and help prevent tribal and regional conflict. Farming would migrate west into Europe, just as the R1b Haplogroup and the Hays did. 

About 6000 years ago (4000 BCE) horses were domesticated on the Western Asian Steppes.   Mankind emerged from the Stone Age and into the Bronze Age about 3000 BCE.  Wheeled vehicles, including war chariots, and metal weapons and tools were developed (the Yamnaya Culture).  Advances in the tools of war and the tools of agriculture occurred as societies moved from the Bronze Age into the Iron Age.  These “Metal Age Invaders” moved into Europe and mixed with the European Farming Cultures.  Haplogroup R1b and subclade M269 were common in all of western Europe with 110 million men carrying the M269 marker today.  

Allistair Moffat in “The Scots: A Genetic Journey” explains that the migration of the M269 subclade corresponds to the advancement of farming.  Seeds of founder crops, domesticated animals in tow, and farming knowledge being necessary for the advancement of farming, he believes that the advance of farming was concurrent with the migration of men and not only the migration of knowledge by itself.  He believes that the explosion of the M269 marker which coincides with the development of farming across Europe was by those who moved and took a local as a wife.  The larger farm families and the need for new lands for sons to farm would seem to support this theory.  

About 800 BCE the Hays and the R1b Haplogroup, M269 subclade would be in the Italian Alps (part of the Halstatt Culture 800-450 BCE) with migration continuing into central and western Europe (the La Tene Culture 450-1 BCE).  The Iron Age started about 1200 BCE and in Europe about 700 BCE.  Iron improved farm implements greatly.  The development of steel from iron as we approached the Common Era (CE) greatly improved war implements, both weapons and defensive armor and shields.  

Halstatt Culture and La Tene Culture – Source Wikipedia.org used under fair use doctrine.

The Halstatt Culture were Celtic, speaking a Proto-Celtic language, and they had no written records.  They had a societal hierarchy of slaves, soldiers, farmers, and craftsmen under a Chieftain who ruled from fortifications on top of a mound.  There was a hierarchy of Chiefs and Kings above them.  Horses, wagons and chariots were used in war with soldiers armed with sword, spear, and wearing body armor.  Iron ploughs improved agricultural production and the tribes traded goods as far away as Greece and China.  The Halstatt Culture evolved into the La Tene Culture.  

The Hays line continued their migration west into Normandy and from there came into Scotland with the Norman Conquest.  The M269 subclade occurs in 70% of Scottish Men, including the Hays.  For 800 years the Hays stayed in the Scottish Lowlands. Persecution for their Presbyterian Religion and their Scottish Ancestry fostered one final move westward in the 1600’s into Northern Ireland for about 2 generations.  Here they would again suffer persecution and want of necessities and so they looked to again migrate west over the Atlantic Ocean, a risky adventure, but one which might provide liberty of conscious and opportunity for them and their children.  

Little did they know that the travel west to America would put them face to face with the Haplogroup Q cousins that decided east over west 35,000 years ago.  And that the landing on the East coast of North America was only the beginning of another migration west, this one across America, pioneers, farmers, and soldiers, on a 200 year journey which won’t end until the Pacific Ocean is reached. 

Oh Mother Dear, a 1945 WW II soldiers poem home

Photo: Easter early 1930’s Olton, TX with Ruth (Price) Hays, by age Ora Lee, William Wayne, Vida Lou, R. Della, and James Henry Hays.

The dust bowl and a hard farm life and the great depression and then the war started, December 7, 1941, with a day of infamy.  The war started for Dad (James Henry Hays) when he was just 18, a boy by today’s standards, in April of 1943 when he was sent to infantry training.  Young men had no choice “we can fight them over there or fight them here”.  “There” was the better option, trading military deaths to save civilian deaths, son’s, brothers, and fathers sacrificing to keep their families safe.  

Sent to the 127th Infantry, 32nd Red Arrow Brigade in the Pacific Campaign, for the next 2+ years he fought his way across New Guinea, Leyte, and Luzon, often in hand to hand combat, and eventually found himself with the occupation forces after Japan formally surrendered September 2, 1945, among the first American Troops to occupy Japan.  

After 2 years of combat and a day off consisting of humping ammo crates and other supplies, or sitting in the infirmary sick with malaria or jungle rot on your feet preventing you from walking, or recovering from a war wound so you can get back into the fight, having a Sunday off must have been a real treat. It also afforded one time to put thoughts to pen and paper and write home to your mother, which Dad did. Oh Mother Dear it begins…

3% of the worlds population, some 85 million people, were dead from direct military action and also by disease and starvation.  The global war which lasted from 1939 to 1945 was over for most but some risk remained for many, including those occupying a defeated country, evidenced by the “if and when I get home” line in Dad’s poem from Japan he wrote to his mother.  But the poem also spoke to the fact the worse was over and things could get back to “normal”, if there is such a thing.

I imagine the poem stayed cherished in my Grandmothers possession, hope for the future that her boy would come home, which eventually came to be.   I’m sure it passed back to Dad after her death, to sit in an old box in the attic with other old photo’s, letters, and mementos; many awards and decorations from his service, as he lived his life. 

The box passed to me at some point after first Dad then Mom died, un-inventoried until my retirement where my initial look revealed a highly faded piece of history, luckily found just before fading into oblivion, now 75 years old.   The 2 pages were folded alone in an envelope so I’m guessing it was sent all by itself. 

After all the suffering and death and hard times it conveyed a lot of information in a short little poem. But mostly it conveyed hope for the future, to be home with family for a Sunday afternoon dinner and dessert cake or pie made by Mom. Heartfelt sentiments from a soldier to his mother in hard times and a fitting tribute to mothers this mothers day.

Oh Mother Dear

I think of you every day, Even though you’re many miles away, And someday before long, I’ll get back where I belong.

If and when I do get home, I’ll settle down and never roam, Be patient, Oh mother Dear, For I hope to be back within a year.

Don’t be worried or filled with fright, For I’m protected even at night. Our number is small, but we post a guard, It isn’t easy Mom, it’s very hard.

It’s hell to work all day, and night too, But in a way you don’t get so blue, We get Saturday and Sunday to rest, It gives us time to think of you, the best.

I’ll never forget the cake and pie too, That can be made by only you. The Sunday dinners I’ll never forget, No one can best them, on that I’d bet.

I hate the thought of being away from you, But someone has this job to do. Being part of the occupation force isn’t fun, But I think it best in the long run.

We just won a war & don’t want another, I’d rather be with you, my mother. It’s for certain we couldn’t loose, So you know the side I would choose.